(Continued from page 47.)
Division III. (Chaps. 32-37).
The manifestation of God's character of holiness and of mercy, as exhibited in the testimony of Elihu.
We have now reached a most important and interesting division of the entire book-the mediatorial address of Elihu. That we are justified in so speaking of it will be seen as we follow him in his noble words for God, and his searching and helpful words for Job. He reminds Job of his own desire for such a person:"Neither is there any daysman betwixt us, that might lay his hand upon us both " (chap. 9:33); "Oh that one might plead for a man with God, as a man pleadeth for his neighbor" (chap. 16:21). To this desire Elihu now replies:"Behold, I am according to thy wish, in God's stead; I also am formed out of the clay. Behold my terror shall not make thee afraid, neither shall my hand be heavy upon thee " (chap. 33:6, 7).
The appropriateness of Elihu's entrance just here is evident. The friends had been silenced, but apparently unconvinced ; Job is left master of the situation, so far as self-vindication could give him such a place; and yet not only was the dark enigma unsolved, but God's character had been obscured. If the book had closed at this point, we would have had more difficulties raised than settled, and unbelief would have lurked among the grand but melancholy shades of the controversy, as it does to this point. On the other hand, if God had spoken directly, revealing Himself in majesty and power, as in the following division, the transition would have been too sudden, and Job's fear of being terrorized by His glory might have been justified.
Elihu therefore fits exactly into his place, giving another illustration of the divine authorship and perfection of the book. His address fittingly occupies the third place, for it is the moral manifestation of God, the display of His character, thus leading us out of the conflict of human thought on the one side, and preparing us for the right view of the "Faithful Creator " on the other.
In accordance with what has just been said, we find the address partakes, in its first part, of the style of the controversy between Job and his friends, though far different in other respects. At the close it is almost conformed to the words of Jehovah, dealing, as it does, with the grand displays of His glory and power as seen in the works of nature.
It seems strange that any other thought of Elihu could have been entertained, and yet from earliest times Christian expositors have held most contradictory views. Many have pointed out the fitness and wisdom of all that he says, but others have spoken of him as an impudent intruder-a young man puffed up with a sense of his own learning and importance! Elihu's appearance is styled "an uncalled-for stumbling in of a conceited young philosopher into the conflict that is already properly ended; the silent contempt with which one allows him to speak, is the merited reward of a babbler!"
If such contentions have a spark of truth in them, why is nothing said in the book about Elihu ? Why is not he made to bring an offering with the three friends, and secure Job's intercession ? Or is he too far gone even for such recovery ? It has been said indeed that God rebukes him in the beginning of His reply:"Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge " (chap. 38 :2) ? But this reply is to Job, not Elihu, and Job so recognizes it. It has also been said that Elihu himself is thrown into confusion by the appearing of Jehovah, and becomes incoherent and inane (chap. 37:19-24). We can only reply that to argue thus shows that one has failed to grasp the beauty of a most transcendent passage, viewed either as poetry or as the language of inspiration. But we turn from all this to look at the details which now come before us.
Elihu's address is divided for us practically by the language employed in the first verse of chapters 34, 35, and 36. This leaves us with but the introductory address to the friends and Job (chapters 32 and 33:1-7), to be separated from his first main argument (chap. 33:8-33), and we have the five divisions of his address.
(1) The emptiness and failure of the controversy (chaps. 32-33:7).
(2) God's purpose in chastening (chap. 33:8-33).
(3) His character vindicated (chap. 34).
(4) His testing of men (chap. 35).
(5) His working among men and in nature (chaps. 36, 37).
As already noticed, there is a manifest progress throughout the address; and well defined links with what precedes and follows.
I.- The emptiness and the failure of the controversy (chaps. 32-33:7).
This portion is chiefly introductory. We have first an explanatory prelude in prose, introducing Elihu – somewhat similar to the opening and closing chapters of the book. This is followed by a courteous explanation of his silence thus far, and a scathing rebuke of the friends for their failure. He, however, is full of matter, and must speak with no uncertain sound for the honor of his Maker. He closes his exordium in words of conciliating kindness to Job, inviting any response he may have to give. The whole forms an admirable opening, in which modesty, indignation, earnestness and graciousness are blended together.
(1) Explanatory introduction (vers. 1-5).
(2)Reasons for his silence (vers. 6-10).
(3) The failure of the friends (vers. 11-13).
(4) He must speak (vers. 14-22).
(5)The daysman (chap. 33 :1-7).
(I) This is the first mention we have of Elihu. He is not spoken of in the visit of the friends, Eliphaz, Bildad and Zophar, in chap. 2 :11-13. While no direct statement to that effect is made, it is not improbable that persons may have come and gone during the controversy. No time limit is set, and there may have been periods of silence between the addresses. Be that as it may, Elihu had been an interested listener throughout, and was therefore in a position to speak when the others had become silent.
There is much appropriateness in the significance of his name-"My God is He." He does not speak for himself, but for God. In this way he is typical of our Lord, whose one object was to speak for the Father:"I have declared unto them Thy name " (John 17:26).
He was the son of Barachel, "May God bless," suggesting, may we not say, that the blessing or favor of God is given to the one who stands for Him alone:"This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased " (Matt. 3:17). As son of Barachel, we have a suggestion of the relationship between our Lord and the Father-"The Son of the Blessed." He was ever that; therefore, when He came into the world He could say, "I delight to do thy will, O God." Apart however from this full thought, we may gather that God's blessing produces and ever accompanies faithfulness to Him.
The family names are next given, "the Buzite, of the kindred of Ram." Buz was one of the sons of Nahor, and therefore connected with Abraham. Ram has been supposed to be abbreviated from Aram, marking the country where the family abode. Elihu therefore belonged to a well-known family and locality. But when we consider the significance of these names, we find a striking accord with what we have already seen. Buzi-"the despised;" Ram, "the exalted." We know of whom both these are true:"He is despised and rejected of men;" "He shall be exalted and extolled, and be very high " (Isa. 53:3; 52:13). Thus we have illustrative confirmation of Elihu's typical place and work. We come now to the address.
The three friends having been silenced, and Job being left entrenched in his self-righteousness, Elihu's anger is doubly stirred-against Job for failing to glorify God by acknowledging His righteousness, and against the friends for stubbornly maintaining their accusations while unable to give a single proof. Elihu's attitude is perfectly explained in these few words. The remaining verses explain his courtesy in remaining silent, because of his youth and their age.
(2) He explains this silence now, in courteous words. However, it is not mere age which gives wisdom, but the spirit which comes from God-the breathing of God, which has made mortal man different from the beasts. So he, if he speak the wisdom of God, is entitled to be heard.
(3) He had carefully attended to all they had said, and not one of them had convinced Job, or satisfactorily answered him. We need only look back at the addresses of Eliphaz, beginning in such an elevated, dignified way, and ending in most brutal charges; at the similar, though not so harsh, words of Bildad; and at the vehement declarations of Zophar, to see how fully Elihu was justified in his statements. Truly he could add, they had no right to claim they had found out wisdom. It was God, he declares, not man, who had thrust Job down, and made him realize his helplessness.
(4) Job has had no controversy with him, and he will not descend into the arena of the others, to strive with ineffectual words. Their present silence shows how completely vanquished they were. He now will speak-even he. For he is full, and must give utterance to the spirit that stirs within him, which is like new wine seeking a vent. He is constrained; necessity is laid upon him. How different is this from the scholarly, deliberate arguments to which Job had thus far been compelled to listen, or from a vehemence which had little of wisdom or justice in it. We are reminded of the apostle's word "Necessity is laid upon me " (i Cor. 9:16).
Nor will he use flattering words. He has no respect of persons, and this qualifies him to be the spokesman for God. All is most excellent. There is a tone of authority-"and not as the scribes"- that tells of one who knows whereof he speaks.
(5) Lastly, he turns to Job, not in the anger which will find a place later, but calmly and graciously. He entreats Job to listen to him, for all will be gone into fairly. His wisdom comes, not from human knowledge or experience merely, but is from the Almighty. Job is free to answer him if he does not accept his statements, for he, as well as Elihu, has a link with God. This seems to be the thought of the first part of the 6th verse. It reminds Job that God makes known His mind in a gentle way, that Job himself may learn that mind. And yet it reminds us of a divine authority which knew whereof he spoke. Then Elihu was a man, too, so Job need not be terrified. He could say, as Peter, "I myself also am a man " (Acts 10:26).
Let us, then, not despise the youth of Elihu, but listen to the sober lessons he will give us. We may look for better things than the accusations and reasonings of man, or the wail of the afflicted. S. R.
(To be continued.)