Tag Archives: Issue WOT29-2

Christ Magnified, Whether by Life or by Death

It is the practical experience of the apostle Paul’s heart in connection with Christ that is so marked in verse 20. The heart of a believer attentive to the Spirit’s teaching must feel that one cannot read this verse without seeing that Paul had a practical connection with the Nazarene in heaven, that he believed in a Christ who was not in heaven only, but in his own soul, so that he could think of nothing but this Christ. That which would not be joy to the heart of Christ, he as a believer in Christ could not joy in; and that which had Christ for its object could not do otherwise than turn to his salvation, through prayer and the supply of the Spirit. His only thought in everything was that Christ should be magnified in his body, whether by life or death (verse 20). This occupied his whole heart; and you and I may realize it as much as he did.

Can you and I say that we have only one simple desire; that is, that through us Christ should be magnified? To magnify anything is to make it appear larger than it is; that could not be so in connection with Christ. But Paul wanted all to shine out in him, so that Christ should be magnified through him_so shine out that all should be able to say, "What a marvelous thing! there is a man so spending his life for Christ that he does not care to live if he can but magnify Christ by his death! What a marvelous Person that Christ must be!"

Paul had the expectation that through him Christ should be glorified now in the wilderness, that now Christ should be magnified. The love of Christ constrained him, drew him along in the path after Christ. Oh, what manifestation of Christ it is when the display of His handiwork is seen in a Saul of Tarsus, the oil of anointing so flowing down to the servant that it could be said of that servant, "Like Master, like servant!" What a blessed servant this servant of Christ is in a dungeon, not knowing whether he was to live or die, occupied only with the one thought of glorifying Christ there, of being a fellow helper with Him down here! Whether his feet are in fetters or not, he could say, "It is Christ I have for my portion in this dungeon; and whether I am here for life or death, it is my earnest expectation and hope that Christ shall be magnified in my body, whether by life or by death."

To what extent have we become fellow workers with Paul? To what degree are we maintaining our Nazariteship and living out Christ so that, whatever our circumstances, the power of the life of Christ in us may be seen as in Paul? How far is seen in us, from day to day, the mind of Christ? The same mind that led Him down, even to the death of the cross, is the mind that we ought to have. We are to let the power of the grace that found us, and gave us life, tell its own tale by the manifestation of that life in all our circumstances in our wilderness path.

  Author: G. V. Wigram         Publication: Issue WOT29-2

Bearing About in the Body the Dying…

"Always bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body. For we which live are always delivered unto death for Jesus’ sake, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our mortal flesh" (2 Cor. 4:10,11).

This fourth chapter of 2 Corinthians is the apostle Paul’s statement of power for ministry. He shows us in these stirring verses that God is not looking for brilliant men, is not depending upon eloquent men, is not shut up to the use of talented men in sending His gospel out into the world. God is looking for broken men, for men who have judged themselves in the light of the cross of Christ. When He wants anything done, He takes up men who have come to an end of themselves, and whose trust and confidence is not in themselves but in God.

There were those who were calling in question the apostle-ship of Paul himself, for he did not seem to them to be what an apostle, according to their estimation of the office, ought to be. There was not the pomp nor the dignity they would expect; he did not come to them with great swelling words; there was no making anything of what he was after the flesh; no drawing attention to his natural ability or education; and in this the method of the apostle Paul was in very vivid contrast to the method pursued by many today who pose as servants of our Lord Jesus Christ. This man went through the world a broken man, a lowly man, a man seeking only the glory of the Lord Jesus Christ and the blessing of souls, a man who might have occupied a very high place among the great and distinguished of earth. But he was a man who for Jesus’ sake had turned his back upon all that, and could say, "God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom the world is crucified unto me, and I unto the world" (Gal. 6:14). That cross spoke of the deepest shame and ignominy, and Paul gloried in it because through the work that took place upon it his soul had been saved, and he had learned that the preaching of the cross, while it is "to them that perish foolishness," is "unto us which are saved the power of God" (1 Cor. 1:18). And so he went forth content to be broken in order that the light of the grace of God might shine out.

You will notice in verse 6 (2 Cor. 4) that "God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. But we have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellency of the power may be of God, and not of us." It is easy to see what he has in mind. He is thinking undoubtedly of that very striking incident of which we read in Judges, when Gideon and his three hundred men took their lives in their hands, were delivered unto death, as it were, and went forth against the vast armies of the Midianites. Surely no other army was accoutered as this one. They carried in one hand a trumpet, and in the other a pitcher, and in this pitcher was a lamp. The light of the lamp was not seen though it was already lit. It was not seen as long as it was in the earthen jar. They surrounded the army of the Midianites in the middle of the night, and suddenly at the command of their leader the jars were crashed to earth, and the light shone out, and the Midianites sprang up startled. They heard the crash and saw the light, and thought that they were surrounded by a tremendous army, and they turned their swords upon one another. It was God through Gideon that led the army to victory. A broken pitcher in order that light might shine out! The apostle says, as it were, "That is it! If you want to be a light for God in a world like this, be content to be broken, to have your hopes, your ambitions, all dashed to pieces, and then God can take you up and use you in order to carry the light of Christ to darkened hearts."

How are we broken? By affliction, by trouble, by the discipline of the Lord, sometimes by sickness, by pain and anguish. All these are the divine methods for breaking God’s pitchers in order that the light may shine out to His praise and glory. Men may misjudge us, misrepresent us, persecute us bitterly; we may not have enough food to eat or water to drink; we may be cast down; we may suffer all kinds of sorrows; but it is all right if it breaks us in order that God may be able the better to use us. And so he says, "We are troubled on every side, but not distressed; we are perplexed, but not in despair; persecuted, but not forsaken; cast down, but not destroyed"; for in all these experiences we are simply "bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life also of Jesus may be made manifest in our body." He "came from Godhead’s fullest glory down to Calvary’s depth of woe."

We sometimes sing a little hymn that always stirs the heart. I remember hearing Dr. Torrey say that he believed of all the hymns that were used in his great meetings around the world, it was the one that seemed to be most blessed of God to the people. It is:

"I surrender all,
I surrender all,
All to Thee, my blessed Saviour,
I surrender all."

But that hymn never had the appeal it ought to have for my own heart until one day I found myself changing that chorus. I was thinking of Him who though He was "in the form of God, thought equality with God not a thing to be grasped; but made Himself of no reputation, and took upon Him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men; and being found in fashion as a man, He humbled Himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross" (Phil. 2:6-8). And as my heart was occupied with Him, 1 found myself singing these words:

"He surrendered all,
He surrendered all,
All for me, my blessed Saviour,
He surrendered all."

And then my heart said, "O Lord, it will be easy to sing it the other way now, for what have I to give up, to surrender, in comparison with what Thou didst give up in order to redeem my guilty soul from going down to the pit?" It is as you and I realize from day to day what it all meant to Him that we can bear about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus:dying day by day to our own hopes and ambitions, dying to the good opinion of people, dying to human praise and adulation, to everything that the natural heart grasps, dying in the death of Jesus to it all, because He died for us in order that the life of Jesus may be made manifest in our body.

You will notice that verses 10 and 11 are very much alike, and yet the great difference is this:verse 10 suggests something that we do deliberately, consciously, whereas verse 1.1 is something that God does for us. What is it we are called to do? "Always bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus"_reminding ourselves every day that Jesus died for us, and because He died for us we are gladly to put ourselves in the place of death for Him.

Looking back to the cross the apostle Paul could say, "I am crucified with Christ:nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh, 1 live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave Himself for me" (Gal. 2:20). But this has to be put into practice daily by putting my tastes and ambitions in the place of death. That is my part. But here is God’s part:"We which live are always delivered unto death for Jesus’ sake, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our mortal flesh." You tell God that you are willing to take the place of death with Christ, and He will see that it is made good; you tell God you are going to trust Him, and He will test your faith and show you what it means to trust Him; you tell Him that you are ready to surrender everything to Him, and He will put you in the place where you will begin to find out what full surrender really means. I do not know of anything that it seems should have such an appeal to the Christian heart along this line as the frequent remembrance of our Lord Jesus Christ in His death, and 1 think it is because He realized that it is so easy for us to forget, that He said to His disciples when He gave them this memorial feast, "This do in remembrance of Me" (Luke 22:19). And the Holy Ghost said, "As often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do show the Lord’s death till He come" (1 Cor. 11:26). Every time we are called upon thus to remember the Lord it is a new challenge to ask ourselves, "Am I simply remembering Him in a cold, formal, intellectual way because it is customary, or am I truly in heart remembering the One who went down beneath the dark waters of death for me, and am I truly ready now to always bear about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus?"

What a poor thing it is to come together in assemblies to participate in the communion of the Lord’s Supper and then go out from the building and forget what it all really means, forget that our Saviour died, that we are linked up with the One who died, and that He has left us an example that we should follow His steps_that is, we should always bear about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus. This seems to me to be linked very intimately with several Old Testament references to which our attention is drawn in Hebrews 11. We read, "By faith Joseph, when he died, made mention of the departing of the children of Israel, and gave commandment concerning his bones" (Heb. 11:22). Did you ever stop and ask why the Holy Spirit selected that particular incident to dwell upon? He has instanced something that you and I would probably have passed over altogether. What did Joseph do? "Gave commandment concerning his bones." In Gen. 50:25 we read where Joseph, talking to the children of Israel, says, "God will surely visit you, and ye shall carry up my bones from hence. So Joseph died, being an hundred and ten years old; and they embalmed him, and he was put in a coffin in Egypt." That is the close of the Book of Genesis. What an odd way to close the book! But God wants us to think about the bones of Joseph. They are there in a coffin in Egypt, but they are to be carried to Canaan. In Exodus 13 we find that the children of Israel who have been sheltered by the blood of the passover lamb are now starting out for Canaan, and we read, "Moses took the bones of Joseph with him, for he had straitly sworn the children of Israel, saying, God will surely visit you; and ye shall carry up my bones away hence with you" (Exod, 13:19). Who was Joseph? He was the saviour of Israel. If it had not been for him they would have all been destroyed in the famine; but he was their saviour, and now he says, "When you leave Egypt to go to Canaan, you carry my bones with you." When they left, they were very careful to do as they were told, and all the way across the sands of the desert wherever that great caravan went they were always bearing about in the body the dying of Joseph.

By and by when they reached the land, when they got to the place that God Himself had selected for them, we are told, "The bones of Joseph, which the children of Israel brought up out of Egypt, buried they in Shechem, in a parcel of ground which Jacob bought of the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem, for an hundred pieces of silver; and it became the inheritance of the children of Joseph" (Josh. 24:32). There was no need to carry the bones of Joseph through the wilderness any more, for they were at home now. And, beloved, you and I are passing on through the wilderness of this world. We will soon be home, but until we reach there we are called upon to bear about in the body the dying of Jesus, and as we remember Him in the breaking of bread and the drinking of the cup, we should challenge our own hearts:Are we simply looking objectively toward that cross and saying, "There our Saviour died," or are we seeking day by day to practically make it manifest that His death means more to us than all that this world glories in?

(In Help and Food, Vol. 49.)

  Author: Henry Alan Ironside         Publication: Issue WOT29-2

The Sufferings of Christ

It is necessary to distinguish between Christ’s sufferings from man and His sufferings from God. Christ did, we know, suffer from men. He was "despised and rejected of men, a Man of sorrows and acquainted with grief." The world hated Him because He bore witness of it that its works were evil. Christ suffered for righteousness’ sake. The love which caused the Lord to minister to men in the world and to testify of their evil brought only more sorrow upon Him. For His love He received hatred in return.

He suffered also from the hand of God upon the cross. "It pleased the Lord to bruise Him; He hath put Him to grief." He was made sin for us who knew no sin, and then he was wounded for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities. There He suffered, the Just for the unjust; that is, He suffered not because He was righteous, but because we were sinners, and He was bearing our sins in His own body on the tree. As regards God’s forsaking Him, He could say, "Why hast Thou forsaken Me?" for in Him there was no cause. We can give the solemn answer. In grace He suffered, the Just for the unjust; He had been made sin for us. Thus, He suffered for righteousness, as a living Man, from men; as a dying Saviour, He suffered from the hand of God for sin.

Let us consider other types of suffering experienced by our blessed Lord. In the first place, His heart of love must have suffered greatly from the unbelief of unhappy man, and from His rejection by the people. He often sighed and groaned in spirit when He came in contact with the people. He wept and groaned within Himself at the tomb of Lazarus at seeing the power of death over the spirits of men and their incapacity to deliver themselves. And He wept also over Jerusalem when He saw the beloved city about to reject Him in the day of its visitation. All this was the suffering of perfect love, moving through a scene of ruin, in which self-will and heartlessness shut every avenue against this love which was so earnestly working in its midst.

A weight of another kind pressed upon the Lord often, I doubt not, through His life. This was the anticipation of His sufferings on the cross and their true and pressing character. On His path of life lay death. And for Him death was death-man’s utter weakness, Satan’s extreme power, and God’s just vengeance. In this death He would be alone, without one sympathy, forsaken of those whom He had cherished, and the object of enmity of the rest of the people. The Messiah was to be delivered to the Gentiles and cast down, the judge washing his hands of condemning innocence, the priests interceding against the guiltless instead of for the guilty. All was dark, without one ray of light even from God. Here perfect obedience was needed and (blessed be God!) was found. What sorrow this must have been for a soul who anticipated these things with the feelings of a Man made perfect in thought and apprehension by the divine light which was in Him. He could not fail to fear the forsaking of God and the cup of death He had to drink.

In Gethsemane, when the cross was yet nearer, and the prince of this world was come, and His soul was exceeding sorrowful unto death, this character of sorrow and trial, or temptation, reached its fullness. In Gethsemane all was closing in. The deep agony of the Lord told itself out in few (yet how mighty!) words and in sweat as it were drops of blood. Yet when the soldiers came to apprehend Him, He freely offered Himself to drink that cup which the Father had given Him to drink. Wondrous scene of love and obedience! Whatever the suffering may have been, it was the free moving of a Man in grace, but of a Man perfect in obedience to God.

Sin itself must have been a continual source of sorrow to the Lord’s mind. If Lot vexed his righteous soul with seeing and hearing the evil of Sodom when he was himself so far from God in his practical life, what must the Lord have suffered in passing through the world! He was distressed by sin. He looked on the Pharisees with anger, being grieved at the hardness of their hearts. He was in a dry and thirsty land where no water was, and He felt it, even if His soul was filled with marrow and fatness. The holier and more loving He was, the more dreadful was the sin to Him.

The sorrows of mankind were also in His heart. He bore their sicknesses and carried their infirmities. There was not a sorrow nor an affliction He met that He did not bear on His heart as His own. "In all their afflictions He was afflicted." Our sins He bore too, and was made sin for us, but that, as we have seen, was on the cross_obedience, not sympathy. God made Him, who knew no sin, to be sin for us. All the rest was the sympathy of love, though it was sorrow. This is a blessed character of the Lord’s sorrow. Love brought Him to the cross, we well know; but His sorrow there had not the present joy of a ministration of love. He was not dealing with man, but suffering in his place, in obedience, from God and for man. Hence, it was unmingled, unmitigated suffering_the scene, not of active goodness, but of God forsaking. But all His sorrow in His ways with men was the direct fruit of love, sensibly acting on Him. He felt for others, about others. That feeling was (oh, how constantly!) sorrow in a world of sin; but that feeling was love. This is sweet to our thought. For His love He might have hatred, but the present exercise of love has a sweetness and character of its own which no form of sorrow it may impart ever takes away; and in Him it was perfect.

Another source of sorrow was the violation of every delicacy which a perfectly attuned mind could feel. They stood staring and looking upon Him. Insult, scorn, deceit, efforts to catch Him in His words, brutality, and cruel mocking fell upon a not insensible, though divinely patient, spirit. Reproach broke His heart. He was the song of the drunkards. No divine perfection saved Him from sorrow. He passed through it with divine perfection, and by means of it. But I do not believe there was a single human feeling (and every most delicate feeling of a perfect soul was there) that was not violated and trodden on in Christ. Doubtless, it was nothing compared with divine wrath. Men and their ways were forgotten when He was on the cross; but the suffering was not the less real when it was there. All was sorrow, but the exercise of love, and that must, at last, make way for obedience in death where the wrath of God closed over and obliterated the hatred and wickedness of men. Such was Christ. All sorrow concentrated in His death where the comfort of active love and the communion with His Father could put no alleviating sweetness with that dreadful cup of wrath. He gave up everything on the cross, but afterward He received glory anew from His Father’s hand_glory which He had ever had, but now would enter into as Man.

  Author: John Nelson Darby         Publication: Issue WOT29-2

Evidences for Resurrection of Christ(Part 1)

The doctrine of the resurrection of Christ is not merely one of the many tenets of the Christian faith. Without the resurrection, Christ’s death on the cross would have been void of meaning and there would be no Christian religion today.

Belief in the resurrection of Christ is essential for our salvation (Rom. 10:9). His resurrection is the basis of our justification (Rom. 4:25). Whenever the apostles preached the gospel they brought in the fact of the resurrection (Acts 2:24,32; 3:15; 4:10; 10:40; 13:30; 17:31). The resurrection was also a proof that Jesus Christ was indeed who He claimed to be, namely, the co-equal Son of God (Matt. 27:54). Furthermore, if Christ had not risen from the dead:(1) our faith would be in vain (1 Cor. 15:14); (2) we would still be in our sins (15:17); (3) there would be no resurrection of the dead (15:12,20); (4) we could not have the promise of His coming again for us (John 14:1-3); (5) the Holy Spirit would not have come down (John 7:39; Acts 2:33); (6) there would be no Church (Eph. 1:20-22; Col. 1:18).

Since the resurrection of Christ is so central to the Christian faith, it is important that each believer have a clear understanding of the evidences for the resurrection. This is because Satan would like nothing better than to shake our faith in the resurrection of Christ. Satan has many human servants_some even in the guise of Christian ministers and leaders_who are active in spreading doubts in people’s minds as to the reality of Christ’s resurrection. A number of false theories as to the resurrection have been propounded in order to relieve people of their obligation to place their faith in Christ, or else to relieve them of any guilt feelings or anxiety for not having accepted Christ as Saviour and Lord. Therefore, both to strengthen ourselves against this satanic propaganda as well as to enable us to help bring the truth to others caught up in it, we do well to refresh our minds as to the scriptural evidences for the resurrection of Christ.

First we will consider ten important scriptural facts relating to the resurrection of Christ. Then, in a later issue, we will discuss four false theories concerning the resurrection and how these can be thoroughly refuted by Scripture.

Ten Facts Relating to the Resurrection of Christ

1. Jesus prophesied His own resurrection. The frequent statements by Jesus that He was going to die were not remarkable. However, He never predicted His death without also speaking of being raised again; and in most cases He specifically claimed that He would rise the third day (Matt. 12:38-40; 16:21; 17:9; 17:23; 20:17-19; 26:32; 27:63; John 2:18-22). By making such predictions Jesus laid Himself wide open:if His predictions about His death and resurrection had not come to pass either He would have been quickly forgotten about or He would have gone down in history as a fool and deluded person, not as a great teacher.

2. He was pronounced dead. "When [the soldiers] came to Jesus, and saw that He was dead already, they brake not His legs" (John 19:33). But in case there had been any mistaking that Jesus was truly dead, "one of the soldiers with a spear pierced His side, and forthwith came there out blood and water" (19:34). Several hours later Pilate gave the body to Joseph of Arimathea for burial after receiving confirmation from the centurion that Jesus had been dead for some while (Mark 15:43-45).

3. He was wrapped in cloth with spices. Nicodemus brought a hundred litra (equaling about 70 pounds avoirdupois) mixture of myrrh and aloes, and he and Joseph took "the body of Jesus and wound it in linen clothes with the spices, as the manner of the Jews is to bury" (John 19:39-40). The spices were wrapped up in the various layers of cloth that were wound about the body.

4. The tomb was sealed. It is notable that the chief priests and Pharisees gave more credence to Jesus’ predictions than did the disciples. They went to Pilate, saying, "We remember that deceiver said, while He was yet alive, After three days I will rise again. Command therefore that the sepulchre be made sure until the third day, lest His disciples come by night and steal Him away, and say unto the people, He is risen from the dead. … So they went, and made the sepulchre sure, sealing the stone, and setting a watch" (Matt. 27:62-66). The sealing of the tomb went beyond placing a large rock at the entrance. To protect against collusion between the disciples and the guards, some sort of seal was placed on the rock_perhaps a cord stretched over the rock with a wax or clay seal with the governor’s imprint securing it to the sides of the tomb (see Dan. 6:17 for a similar occurrence). Thus, if anyone tried to move the stone the seal would be broken and Roman law would have been violated.

5. The stone was taken away. The stone was not rolled away so that Jesus could come out, but rather to display an empty tomb (Matt. 28:2-4).

6. The tomb was empty. The fact that the tomb was empty was witnessed by the two Mary’s (Matt. 28:6-8), Peter and John (John 20:3-8), and the men guarding the tomb (Matt. 28:4,11-13). The fact of Christ’s resurrection was preached by the disciples in Jerusalem, not far from the tomb. There were plenty of people around who very much wanted this talk of the resurrection to cease. So if the body of Jesus had still been in the tomb, surely someone would have produced the body and silenced the preachers of the resurrection.

7. The tomb was not quite empty. The grave clothes were still in the tomb_all wrapped up the way they had been wound around the head and body (Luke 23:53; John 20:6,7). If the body had been stolen, the thieves would hardly have taken the time and effort to unwrap the body in the tomb; or else they would have left the linen cloths and the spices lying in a heap. They probably could not have re-wrapped the cloths the way they had originally been wound about the head and body if they had tried. The appearance of the manner in which the grave clothes were lying on the floor of the tomb-suggesting that the body had miraculously passed through the clothes without disturbing them_was so striking that John immediately believed the resurrection when he saw it (John 20:8).

8. Jesus appeared to many witnesses following the resurrection. He appeared to Mary Magdalene (Mark 16:9; John 20:16), to Mary Magdalene and another Mary (Matt. 28:9), to Peter (Luke 24:34; 1 Cor. 15:5), to the two disciples on the road to Emmaus (Mark 16:12; Luke 24:13-31), to the ten disciples in Jerusalem on the resurrection day (Luke 24:36; John 20:19), to the eleven disciples in Jerusalem a week later (John 20:24-26), to the seven disciples at the Sea of Tiberias (John 21:1-14); to the eleven disciples in a mountain in Galilee (Matt. 28:16), to over 500 brethren at once (1 Cor. 15:6), and to James (1 Cor. 15:7). Finally, the eleven disciples witnessed Christ’s ascension into heaven (Acts 1:4-13; 1 Cor. 15:7). Later, the apostle Paul, who probably never saw Jesus on earth, was caught up to the third heaven and saw Him there (1 Cor. 15:8; 2 Cor. 12:2). So for any who would question the veracity of the resurrection, there were many people who could attest to having seen Jesus following His death and resurrection. Even some 26 years later, the apostle Paul wrote to the believers in Corinth that of the 500 or more eyewitnesses of the risen Christ, "the greater part remain unto the present" (1 Cor. 15:6), should there be any doubters among them who desired proof of the resurrection.

9. The disciples’ lives were transformed. Prior to knowledge of the resurrection, "the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews" (John 20:19). Furthermore, during the crucifixion, Peter three times denied knowing Jesus out of fear of being subjected to the same treatment given to Christ (Luke 22:54-61). Following the post-resurrection appearings of the Lord to them, the disciples became very bold and forward in their testimony for Christ. On the day of Pentecost, Peter, with the eleven other disciples standing with him, boldly proclaimed to the Jews the death, resurrection, and ascension of Christ_Israel’s Messiah (Acts 2:14-41). Shortly afterward, Peter had the gall and temerity to proclaim to another assembly of Jews, "Ye denied the Holy One and the Just, and desired a murderer to be granted unto you; and killed the Prince of life, whom God hath raised from the dead" (Acts 3:14,15). When Peter and John were arrested because of their preaching, Peter boldly spoke of Christ to the authorities. As a result, "They saw the boldness of Peter and John, and . . . marveled; and they took knowledge of them, that they had been with Jesus" (Acts 4:13,14). What but the resurrection of Christ could have transformed the fearful, cowardly disciples into fearless, courageous witnesses for Christ?

10. The sabbath was replaced by the first day of the week as the day of worship. The Jewish people were, and still are, strongly attached to the sabbath, the seventh day of the week or Saturday, as their holy day, their day of worship. After all, they had been enjoined in the Ten Commandments to "remember the sabbath day to keep it holy (Exod. 20:8). There had to have been a most profound, stupendous occurrence or revelation to have persuaded the early Christians_ all brought up in the Jewish religion_to abandon the sabbath and start meeting together on the first day of the week (Acts 20:7). That occurrence and revelation was the resurrection of Christ. Because of the centrality of the resurrection to the Christian faith, the first day of the week_that day on which Christ rose from the dead_has replaced the sabbath as the day set aside for the worship of God and remembrance of Christ.

As mentioned at the beginning of this article, a number of false theories have been propounded to explain away the resurrection. These include the following:

1. Christ never actually died on the cross, but only swooned.

2. The body was stolen away by the disciples.

3. All of Christ’s supposed post-resurrection appearances were only hallucinations.

4. Everyone went to the wrong tomb; the empty tomb was not the one Christ was buried in.

Homework Assignment:Using the ten scriptural facts pertaining to the resurrection discussed in this article plus other scriptural facts and any other arguments you can think of, list the points you would use in refuting each of the false theories concerning the resurrection. An award will be given to each person who completes this assignment and submits it to the editor postmarked no later than April 20, 1986. A special prize will be awarded for the entry which, in the editor’s judgment, presents the clearest, most logical, most scripturally sound arguments.

In the next issue, Lord willing, we shall discuss the arguments that refute each of the false theories concerning the resurrection.

FRAGMENT
The Lord is risen! with Him we also rose,
And in His grave see vanquished all our foes.
The Lord is risen! beyond the judgment land,
In Him, in resurrection-life we stand.

  Author: Paul L. Canner         Publication: Issue WOT29-2

Ten Commandments:The Third Commandment

The first four commandments have to do with man’s relationship with God. In the first commandment, we are to acknowledge God as unique, not one of many gods. In the second, we are to own that He is a Spirit-being and cannot be represented by any images of man’s making. Also, He is the self-existent One, the uncreated Creator of all things. As such He is the One whom we are to worship and listen to and take directions from. We are not to worship any images fashioned by man’s hands or put any created being in the place of God Himself as an object of worship or source of direction or authority.

The third commandment recognizes God’s holiness. We are to use His name in a holy, reverent way at all times, and never use it in a vain or empty way. "Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh His name in vain" (Exod. 20:7). One way of taking God’s name in vain was to use it to back up an oath, and then not carry out the oath. God’s people were further warned about this in Lev. 19:12:"Ye shall not swear by My name falsely." The Lord Jesus takes this matter a step further in His Sermon on the Mount:"Ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths. But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven, for it is God’s throne; nor by the earth, for it is His footstool. . . . But let your communication be, Yea, yea; nay, nay; for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil" (Matt. 5:33-37; see also Jas. 5:12). In other words, the people were being asked to develop reputations for being truthful, honest, and reliable. When we make a statement or say we will do something, we should not have to appeal to God to verify our word or make it good. If our truthfulness is questioned, perhaps our response needs to be a humble admission of past failures in speaking the truth and asking forgiveness and forbearance while we seek, with God’s help, to rebuild a reputation for truthfulness.

Have you ever heard one_perhaps even yourself_say:"By God, I’m going to do such and such if it’s the last thing I do!" Such a person is using God’s name in a vain, dishonoring way. What if it is not God’s will that the person do "such and such"? Then it is vain to bring God’s name into the matter. And if, perchance, it is God’s will that the thing be done, is it not better to state something like the following:"If such and such be God’s will, I will do it with His help and strength and according to His timing."

God’s name, and the names of His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ, are very popular in the world today. Those names can be heard very frequently at school, at work, on radio and television, while walking down a busy street, and at most public places. "O my God!" is a particularly common expletive today with little children and adults alike. Sadly, there is not the least thought of the supreme, almighty, holy God by the vast majority of people who use His name in this way. They are but empty words. His name is used in a vain or empty way with no thought whatever of the majesty of the One who owns that precious name. If a co-worker or fellow student were to start deliberately using your name or the name of one of your parents in the same common, empty way many people use the name of God, you no doubt would be deeply offended and outraged. Can you imagine, then, how God feels when His name is used in such a way?

While we, as Christians, may be careful not to use the names of God and Christ in vain in an overt manner, we must be careful to guard against the tendency to employ various euphemisms for these names, such as "gee," "gosh," "golly," and many others. Even expressions such as "for goodness’ sake," which is a euphemism’ for "for God’s sake," should be avoided in our speech.

The New Testament parallel to the third commandment is found in the prayer the Lord gave to His disciples:"Our Father which art in heaven, hallowed be Thy name" (Matt. 6:9). God’s name is holy (Psa. 111:9; Isa. 57:15) and pure. May we be careful to use that name in a way that will maintain its holiness and purity. This goes far beyond the simple avoidance of using the names of God, and euphemisms thereof, in an empty way. It means that whenever we mention the name of God or the name of Jesus Christ to another person, for example, while sharing the gospel or telling what great things God has done for us, we need to be very careful not to say or do anything to that person that would cause the person to get the wrong impression of God or cause the name of God to be blasphemed through us (Rom. 2:24). Waiters and waitresses have reported that people who leave gospel tracts for them tend to be the stingiest tippers. If we are going to speak to others about God_either verbally or through gospel literature_let us seek to reinforce that testimony with a manifestation of some of the attributes of God_ for example, goodness, love, longsuffering, fairness, holiness_in our actions and attitudes toward them. Otherwise, we will be guilty of taking the name of the Lord in vain_ using it in an empty, misleading, and possibly even destructive way.

"Wherefore also we pray always for you . . . that the name of our Lord Jesus Christ may be glorified in you, and ye in Him, according to the grace of our God and the Lord Jesus Christ" (2 Thess. 1:11,12).

  Author: Paul L. Canner         Publication: Issue WOT29-2