THE CHURCH. — ITS MINISTRY. (Continued from page 272.)
(3) Having seen the various classes of ministry, we are now to inquire whence comes the power for its exercise. And this brings us, again, face to face with that most evident fact, which is also most constantly ignored, that the Holy Spirit is present in the Church as the only power for ministry, of whatever kind. This is, in a way, admitted by all evangelical Christians, only to be practically denied by the various schemes for usefulness adopted in the different denominations.
What is power ? Is it the eloquence that attracts and holds multitudes under its spell ? The apostle answers for us-"And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power; that your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God." (i Cor. 2:4, 5.) Here, as in other things, '' that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God, "Who "has chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; . . . yea, and things which are not, to bring to naught things which are; that no flesh should glory in His presence." (i Cor. 1:27-29.) We measure power by work done, not by the show made. The work of an evangelist is that of bringing souls to Christ. One maybe a very attractive and eloquent preacher; he may draw thousands to hear him; nay, large numbers may profess to have been saved under his ministry; but the only test of his power is whether souls have been truly saved. If that has been the case, then we know that the Holy Spirit has been at work; for new birth is His work alone, by the word of truth, no matter what instrument may have been used. So, too, with the teacher. He may be a learned man, a scholar, as was Moses in all the learning of the Egyptians, and yet be without power to impart in any living way the unsearchable riches of Christ. "The things of God knoweth no man but the Spirit of God." (i Cor. 2:2:) There may be the greatest accuracy of Scriptural doctrine, without one particle of power.
The same may be said of the pastor. One may be never so well qualified naturally to sympathize with, guide, cheer, and admonish his brethren, and yet fail in every particular to accomplish anything for God Power in an evangelist is shown in the conversion of souls; in a teacher, in the divine instruction and upbuilding of the people of God; and in a pastor in their true, real shepherding. We repeat-alas! that we all profess to believe it, but so little realize it- that there is not one particle of power apart from the operation of the Holy Spirit. "Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit, . . . For to one is given, by the Spirit, the word of wisdom ; to another the word of knowledge, by the same Spirit; to another, faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing, by the same Spirit; to another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discernment of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues:but all these worketh that one and the self-same Spirit, dividing to every man severally as He will." . . . And God hath set some in the Church; first, apostles; secondarily, prophets; thirdly, teachers; after that miracles; then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of tongues." (i Cor. 12:4, 7-11, 28.) The very mingling, in these verses, of so-called supernatural gifts with the more ordinary ones, is significant. Is it not meant to show us that in the things of God all operations are supernatural? that the true exercise of the gift of teaching is as much a divine function as the working of a miracle? and that the one requires the Holy Spirit as much as the other? Were this truth acted upon, we would see less dependence upon man and more upon God. We would see more true prayer, more deep self-judgment, and we would, as a result see more divine power exercised. Man's power, alas! is like Saul's armor for David, only a hindrance. How often must God strip His people, as in Gideon's day, of all earthly strength, showing them that the treasure is in earthen vessels -and vessels to be broken at that-that the excellency of the power may be seen to be of Him alone. (Judg. 7:1-20; 2 Cor. 4:5-10.)
Let it not be thought for a moment that we would despise knowledge in its true place. Ignorance is no more power than knowledge. There is no virtue in ignorance. Let the man of God be a diligent student. If he is well instructed in human knowledge, it can be of great value. The only danger is in substituting this knowledge for the power of God. Beautiful it is to see the man of learning, laying it all at the Lord's feet, and, as an empty vessel, waiting to be filled and used by Him. But we will leave this portion of our subject as one upon which we need, not instruction, but exhortation, not theory but practice. May God awaken His servants afresh to see where their weakness and their power lies.
(4) We come now to that which is closely related to what we have just left-apparently the same subject. If the source of all ministry is an exalted Christ, and the Holy Spirit is the only power, the whole question as to its exercise would seem to have been settled. And such, we are persuaded, is really the case. A Christ-given and a Spirit-used ministry is assuredly all that the Church of God needs. And yet just here we are brought face to face with a subject which perhaps more than any other, demands our earnest and prayerful examination,-a subject which claims attention from its great antiquity, as well as its great and overshadowing prominence in the present economy in the professing church. We mean the clerical system, which rests upon ordination for its authority. This system had its beginnings in the early church; it was practiced, no doubt, very soon-perhaps immediately-after the times of the apostles. It has taken root so deeply in the very organism of the professing Church that none of the deliverances granted by God to His beloved people from time to time, have availed to loose its hold. It has survived the reformation under Luther, when the Church received again in clearness the foundation truth of justification by faith; it remained after the great awakening of the eighteenth century had revived the people of God. It flourishes amid the gorgeous ritualism of the Roman and Anglican establishments, and no less does it thrive surrounded by the inornate simplicity of Presbyterianism and the independency of Congregationalism. We see it accompanied by all the pomp of ecclesiastical splendor-robes, music, anointing, and all the circumstance devised by man's ingenuity, and borrowed from all times and all religions:we see it also in the simple "laying on of hands," or the modest "minute of approval "in some religious society. Nay, had we eyes to see, we might doubtless trace it in the entirely informal "recognition of gift," which carries with it the weight of authority not divine.
Well may we pause and examine this system. Its very universality demands this, and the fact that it confronts us when we seek to establish the simplicity of scriptural order. Can it be true that what bears the test of orthodoxy so well-"Semper, ubique, ab omnibus "-always, everywhere, and by all observed-is after all a human invention entirely contrary to the spirit and teaching of the word of God ? In all humility, but in all firmness, our reply must be, Yes.
Man is slow to believe God. Even the saved soul finds roots of unbelief still remaining. It is hard to trust, and to go on leaning upon an invisible arm. There can be but little doubt that this unbelief on the part of God's people-this unwillingness to lean upon Him alone, has been the origin of all the various substitutes which put something visible between God and the soul-some visible authority, some one who has official right to speak for God. Coupled with this is the principle of succession-the power to hand down from one to another the authority originally received from God. It makes very little difference through whom this succession comes-whether through bishops, the successors of the apostles, or through the ministers and elders who received their ordination at the hands of the apostles-in either case the principle of succession is established, and in favor of this principle there is no scripture, but very much against it.
Succession denies the cardinal truth that the Holy Spirit is just as really present and as fully active now as when He first descended to form the Church at Pentecost. Instead of teaching us the presence of the One who is all-sufficient to call, equip, and sustain the servants of Christ, it points us back through the intervening centuries-centuries filled with all manner of unspeakable departure from God-to the original call of faithful men set apart for a special work, which work ceased on the establishment of the Church.
If we ask for Scripture for this, we are pointed to the various passages which speak of ordination in the Acts and the epistles. We must therefore take up these scriptures, and sec what they have for us on this subject.
"For this cause left I thee in Crete, that thou shouldest set in order the things that are wanting, and ordain elders in every city, as I had appointed thee." (Tit. 1:5.) The word translated here " ordain " is χαθιστημι, meaning to establish, or set up. It is translated "ordain" also in Heb. 5:i; 8:3, referring to the high-priesthood. We have the same word, variously translated, in Matt. 24:45-made ruler; Luke 12:14-made judge ; Acts 6:3-appoint over this matter. It is the word of most frequent occurrence in connection with the establishment of authority. In Mark 3:14 – "And He ordained twelve, that they should be with Him "-the word is simply made, πoίεω; i Tim. 1:12, "Putting me in the ministry," the word is here "place," τιθημι, translated in chapter 2:7, ordain. The same word is used also in Acts 20:28-"over which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers,"-and in i Cor. 12:18-"God hath set the members, every one of them, in the body as it hath pleased Him." It is interesting to note that every one of these passages refers to God's act, whether it be putting the apostle into the ministry, placing elders over the church at Ephesus, or setting all the various members in the body according to His pleasure.
In Acts 14:23 we have another word-χειρoτovεω:"And when they had ordained them elders in every church." In 2 Cor. 8:19 the same word is translated chosen, which is a more literal rendering, as it means to stretch out the hand, to point out or designate a particular person.(Some authorities would suggest the idea of raising the hand, as in voting, and deduce from this the election by the people of their officers!) These are the passages which refer to ordination. We must now look at the persons ordained, and the manner of their induction into office. This latter is said to have been by the laying on of hands. This expression is used frequently in the gospels, as showing our Lord's manner of healing. The significance of the act seems to be that of taking possession of for the bestowment of blessing. In the Acts we have it used in connection with the bestowal of the Holy Ghost.(Acts 8:17, 18; 19:6.) The thought of conferring something is evident here as well as in the case of Timothy, (i Tim. 14:14;* 2 Tim. 1:6,) where a gift was actually bestowed in this way. *It was by prophecy-a supernatural pointing out-with laying on of hands.* No sober student of Scripture would claim such a thing from ordination now.
When the deacons were appointed by the apostles, (note, not by the saints, but by the apostles,) " they prayed and laid their hands on them." (Acts 6:6.)
In Acts 9:12, 17 the act is one of bodily healing, and typically of spiritual; while in Acts 13:3 it was the act of the saints, expressive of fellowship in the work to which the apostle Paul, and Barnabas, had been called by the Holy Ghost. The lesser surely could not have ordained an apostle.
In i Tim. 5:22 he is exhorted to "lay hands suddenly on no man," to identify himself with no man until he was clear as to his worthiness, whether for fellowship, service, or office.
The passage in Hebrews 6:2, we need hardly say, from its connection, refers to the Old Testament practice of laying on of the hands of the worshiper upon the victim, designating it as his substitute, and thus identifying himself with it. (Lev. 1:4, etc.)
The persons ordained were deacons, elders, and bishops. Acts 6:1-6, in connection with i Tim. 3:8-13, where there seems to be an allusion to Stephen in verse 13, makes it quite clear that the seven appointed by the apostles to care for the distribution of temporal means were deacons. Titus 1:5-7 shows beyond a question that elders and bishops were the same persons. Sec, also, the parallel passage, i Tim. 3:i, 2, and Acts 20:28, where the word " overseers " is but a translation of επισχoπoς, bishop. We have really, then, but the one case of bishop or elder to examine.
Elder is a word that has descended from the patriarchal times of Israel.(Ex. 3:16.)The family was the model of government, and in the family the father, as the elder, had authority. This was transferred to the nation, where the heads of houses became the heads of the nation; and in this sense we have frequent mention of the word in the gospels and Acts. (Matt. 26:3, 47, 57, 59; Acts 4:5, 8.) In Acts 11:30 we have the first application of the word to the leaders in the Church of God, and thereafter it is quite frequently so used. (Acts 14:23; 15:2, 23; 20:17; i Tim. 5:i, 19; Tit. 1:5; i Pet. 1:; 2 John 1:)
Just here we might call attention to the distinction between elders and bishops. Elder was, as we have seen, the ordinary title of the leading people among the Jews-the rulers. It means simply an older person, and is used apart from the idea of office in such passages as i Tim. 5:i, 2 (where we have elder women, the feminine form of the word); i Tim. 5:19; i Pet. 5:i; 2 John 1:; 3 John 1:Older men were naturally the ones qualified for oversight; and from them the apostles appointed bishops or overseers. Elder, then, designates the person, and bishop the work to which he was called. From what we have seen, the terms were used interchangeably.
We have now the material before us from which to gather the teaching of Scripture as to ordination and office in the church of God.
We find that Titus was left in Crete for the purpose of establishing elders or bishops in every place. The qualifications are given-the same as in i Tim. 3:There is no mention of laying on of hands by Titus, nor by Timothy, in connection with the description of the qualifications of a bishop. It is inference indeed-probable, we might say-that Timothy ordained elders; and it would be further inference that this was by the laying on of hands. Taken, however, in connection with the ordination of deacons, to serve tables (Acts 6:1-6), where hands were laid upon them by the apostles, there is no reason for opposing the thought that Timothy or Titus did set apart elders as bishops in this way. The important point to guard, however, is that this laying on of hands was not exclusively applied to ordination, but was, as we have seen, a simple and ordinary act accompanying healing, the gift of the Holy Ghost, identification and fellowship in service. Paul and Barnabas indicated God's choice of elders in every assembly. (Acts 14:23.) Here, again, there is no mention of laying on of hands, though it might naturally accompany the choice. The omission is significant, as showing how comparatively unimportant the act was.
One thing, so far, is clear-that the appointment of elders was restricted to those who were especially commissioned by the apostle. So far from this showing that succession in office was contemplated, it does the reverse. Neither Timothy nor Titus were elders or bishops. Timothy was a young man. We never read of elders or bishops ordaining their successors. There is no hint of such a thing. Ordination then was an apostolic act, clone either directly by the apostle or by those commissioned to act for him.
It is important to note that the name and functions of the elder were derived from Judaism, and that the synagogue furnished the model for this office. We should not overlook the fact that the book of Acts is a history of the transition period from Judaism to Christianity, and that many Jewish practices were permitted during this time to make the change as gradual as possible. Timothy was circumcised. (Acts 16:1-3.)The decree sat Jerusalem(Acts 15:), while they declared freedom from the ceremonial law, forbade those practices which would stumble the conscientious Jew-eating strangled things, and blood. Every Sabbath the apostle went into the synagogue to preach. What wonder, then, that in establishing the assemblies he should, under divine guidance, have set up elders to rule? God was tenderly caring for his beloved people, and would give them no needless shocks. This is the thought underlying the whole book of Acts.
But where have we a hint that ordination was to go on ?i Corinthians is pre-eminently the book of church order, and yet we have no mention of church officials. The house of Stephanas(i Cor. 16:15, 16) addicted themselves to the ministry of the saints, and the brethren were exhorted to recognize by obedience their devoted service. In i Thess. 5:12, 13 we have the same thought. Office and ordination are not even suggested. In Phil. 1:i bishops and deacons are mentioned, but only as part of the assembly at Philippi, to share with the rest the precious unfoldings of Christ in that epistle.
As the Church emerged from the influence of Judaism, it laid aside the swaddling-bands of customs which were appropriate only to a state of infancy, and was left free to be guided and controlled by the Holy Spirit alone. While we bless God for the apostles-the visible representatives of Christ's authority on earth-we recognize that they were connected with the foundations of Christianity, and were never intended to be perpetuated. They have given us the inspired epistles. They nourished the infant Church, and they are now waiting with the Lord until He comes. Then their names will be displayed in the twelve foundations of the heavenly city. But there is not a whisper of Scripture that they have representatives upon earth.
But with the presence of the apostles goes ordination to office, as we have seen. Having passed from under the care of inspired men on earth, the Church has likewise passed from that which was a witness of that care.
So then we are left, not in a state of ruin or incompleteness, but as God intended we should be left, with the Holy Ghost as the only representative of divine authority, and the word of God our all-sufficient guide. The gifts remain, gifts of oversight, as well as of teaching; but the office, the designation by apostolic authority of a certain person for a certain place, has passed. It is well, too, to remember that gift was always distinguished from office even in the apostles' days. They never ordained men to preach or to teach, but only to take charge in the Church. A deacon might preach as did Stephen (Acts 7); not, however, because he was a deacon, but because he had a gift from Christ. An elder might labor in word and doctrine (i Tim. 5:17), not because he was an elder, but because he had the gift. The exhortation in Rom. 12:6-8 was to saints, not to office bearers:- "Having then gifts differing according to the grace that is given to us,'' etc.
It may be urged that the apostle provides for succession in 2 Tim. 2:2. "The things which thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also." But a glance will show that it was the truth which Timothy had received he was to transmit to faithful men – a responsibility which remains for all time.
We are living in times of ruin. That which came so fair from the hands of the Lord, has become so
mutilated as to be practically unrecognizable. The allure is ours, and ours alone. Even now the Church should be "as the morning, fair as the moon, clear as the sun, and terrible as an army with banners." Her failure, we are persuaded, is not due in any degree to the lapse of ordination of any kind whatever ; but to the want of obedient recognition of the Lord's authority and the presence of the Holy Spirit.
If the Church were just as God would have it today, we are persuaded we would not have ordination in it.
And so we return to the wondrous simplicity of God's order for the exercise of ministry:"As every man hath received the gift, even so minister the same one to another as good stewards of the manifold grace of God. If any man speak, let him speak as the oracles of God; if any man minister, let him do it as of the ability which God giveth; that God in all things may be glorified through Jesus Christ, to whom be praise and dominion for ever and ever. Amen. (i Pet. 4:10, 2:) If this is not enough, we can never have more.
To all objections about unworthy men thrusting themselves forward, disorder and irregularity, we can only say, if there is faith and subjection to God, there will be no such difficulties; if there is not faith, the sooner we realize it by being permitted to fall into confusion, the better. God never intended we should get on without Him. Peter on the water, sinking and crying for help, may not have been as decorous an object as his fellows sitting in the boat, but who was nearer to the Lord? Let us never exchange His all-sufficient power for the formal proprieties of a human ministry.
In closing this part of our subject we would again call attention to the fact that for godly men, whether ordained or not, who are Christ's gifts to the Church, we have only the hightest regard and affection. We recognize their gifts. We lament that they should be fettered by this system which we have been examining. Let us pray for all Christ's servants everywhere.