The Christian’s Rule of Life




by J

What is the Christian’s rule of
life? The answer is Christ. Christ is our life, rule, pattern, example, and
everything; the Spirit is our living quickener and power to follow Him; and the
Word of God is that in which we find Him revealed and His mind unfolded in
detail. But while all Scripture, rightly divided, is our light as the inspired
Word of God, Christ and the Spirit are set before us as the pattern, life, and
guide, in contrast with law; and Christ is exclusively everything. Power
accompanies this, for we are "declared to be the epistle of Christ
ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God;
not in tables of stone, but in fleshly tables of the heart…. But we all, with
open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the
same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord" (2 Cor.
3:3,18). In this chapter Christ is presented in contrast with the law. We are
seen to be Christ’s epistle—His letter of recommendation to the world. And
verse 18 shows that there is power in looking at Christ to produce such an
epistle in us. Such power cannot be found in a law. So in Galatians 2:20 and
5:16, in contrast with law, the apostle shows the Spirit to be the power of
godliness.

We have an Object governing the
heart:One to whom we are promised to be conformed, and One to whom we are
earnestly desirous of being as conformed as possible now—One who absorbs our
attention to the exclusion of all else. We are predestinated to be conformed to
the image of God’s Son, that He might be the first born among many brethren
(Rom. 8:29). My delight in Him is the spring of action and motive which governs
me. And my love to Him and the beauty I see in Him are the springs of my
delight in being like Him. It is not a rule written down, but a living
exhibition of One who, being my life, is to be reproduced in me and by me:
"Always bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the
life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body" (2 Cor. 4:10).

Christ is a source to me of all
those things in which I long to be like Him. Beholding with open face the glory
of the Lord, I am changed into the same image. No rule of life can do this.
"Of His fullness we all have received, and grace upon grace (John 1:16
JND). A rule of life has no fullness to communicate. Hence He says,
"Sanctify them through thy truth:thy word is truth…. And for their
sakes I sanctify myself, that they also might be sanctified through the
truth" (John 17:17,19). It is the Spirit taking the things of Christ and
revealing them to us which thus forms us into His image. What a blessed truth
this is! How every affection of the heart is thus taken up with that which is
holiness when I see it in One who not only has loved me, but who is altogether
lovely! Hence I am called to "walk worthy of the Lord unto all
pleasing" (Col. 1:10), and to "grow up into Him in all things, which
is the head, even Christ" (Eph. 4:15).

 

The Object I am now aiming at is
not now on earth; it is Christ risen. This makes my conversation to be
heavenly. Hence he says, "If you then be risen with Christ, seek those
things which are above, where Christ sits on the right hand of God. Set your affection
on things above, not on things on the earth" (Col. 3:1,2). It is by
looking at Christ above that we get to be like Him as He was on earth, and to
walk worthy of Him. We get above the motives which would tie us to earth. We
are to be filled with the knowledge of His will in all wisdom and spiritual
understanding so as to walk worthy of the Lord (Col. 1:9,10). No mere rule can
give this. The law has no reference to this heavenly life. So we are to discern
things that are excellent. Even Abraham did not, in the most excellent part of
his life, walk by rule. He looked for a city that has foundations and was a
stranger and a pilgrim in the land of promise. If we are reduced to a mere rule
of life, we lose the spring of action.

The discernment of a Christian
depends on his spiritual and moral state, and God means it to be so. He will
not be a mere director. He makes us dependent on spirituality even to know what
His will is. The perfection of Christ is set before us as attainment. The
measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ is our measure, our model, our
rule, our strength, and our help in grace, the object of our delight, and our
motive in walking.

Happy is he who keeps by His side
to learn how he ought to walk, and who understands the riches that are in
Christ and the beauty of His ways, and who enjoys communion with Him, pleasing
Him every day more and more!

(From Collected Writings,
Vol. 10.)

Law and Responsibility




by J

The differences between law and
responsibility are immense, and it is important to understand them. Law
comes to man and says, "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart,
and with all your soul, and with all your strength, and with all your mind; and
your neighbor as yourself" (Luke 10:27). It says, Do this and live, but if
you fail in any measure, your doom is sure. Such is law, both in
character and purpose. It is unbending. It cannot forgive. It demands of man
what is right, but it gives him no power to do the right. It forbids and
condemns the wrong, but cannot change the heart of man who naturally loves evil
and hates restraint. Like a dam across the river forbidding the waters to flow
on, it stands as a bulwark against evil, only to find out that the flood breaks
over the dam and still flows on. Law manifests the evil but does not cure it.

Responsibility is what
comes with receiving gifts from God. If, as Creator, He has bestowed upon man
abilities, talents, a mind and a will, each and all of which make him a
creature superior to all others, man is responsible for making use of all this
in the way suited to the purpose God had in giving them. If as Redeemer He bestows
new gifts upon man, those new gifts bring their own responsibilities.

When God came to Abraham and
called him to leave his native land and kindred and go to a place which God
would show him, it was because He had bestowed upon Abraham that which enables
a man to confide in God as a little child confides in its father, trusting
implicitly in the love that guides him. Faith had been imparted to
Abraham. "Faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God"
(Rom. 10:17). While dwelling in his own country the God of glory appeared to
him and said, "Get out of your country, and from your kindred, and come
into the land that I will show you" (Acts 7:2,3).

Abraham was thus brought into a
new relationship with God, and this relationship brought responsibility. The
true God having made Himself known to Abraham, Abraham could no longer serve
false gods. Having been bidden to leave his native land and go to another, he
could no longer feel at home where he was, but must go on as bidden. He may
have been checked and hindered in this, but his new responsibilities pressed
upon him.

 

It was not till after his father’s
death at Haran, part way to Canaan, that Abraham seemed free. From that moment,
"they went forth to go into the land of Canaan, and into the land of Canaan they came" (Gen. 12:5). They did not stop this time, but pressed on to
the end. But all those days of Abraham’s dwelling in Haran, the responsibility
of obeying God was upon Him; while he lingered there, we hear of no word of any
appearance of God to him or of any altar built by him. But as soon as he came
to a stopping place in Canaan, the Lord appeared to him and he built an
altar. There is the obedience of faith on Abraham’s part, grace and blessing on
God’s part. The relationship between God and Abraham was of God’s pure grace;
it involved responsibility on Abraham’s part to believe and obey.

The responsibility was a very
different matter from the law which was given 430 years later. "Get out
… and I will make of you a great nation" (Gen. 12:1,2) is very different
from "Do this and you shall live" or "Cursed is everyone who
disobeys." The principle is different, the purpose of both is different,
and should not be confounded. One reveals God while the other reveals man and
leaves God still in the thick darkness and amid the thunderings and lightnings
of Sinai.

Christians are not under law, but
they have wondrous blessing and grace and privileges and promises. This brings
corresponding responsibilities, and this, if we understand our weakness, as displayed
in Abraham, casts us the more upon God for grace to meet those
responsibilities. The more a child of God realizes his absolute dependence upon
God, and what God has in Christ for His people and gives them whatever they
need, the more will he glorify Him, and the more will such an one enjoy the
grace of God. A sense of our responsibility as children of God will bring us to
Him for strength and wisdom and all else we need. It will, of necessity, make
us a prayerful people.

But law sets men to trying in
their own strength to do what is right, to keep the commandments. Under grace a
believer walks in newness of life, walks after the Spirit in love, and thus in
him the righteousness of the law is fulfilled (Rom. 8:1-4). Under law a soul is
in bondage, trying to do what his fallen nature makes impossible. He is never
at rest, always coming short. One’s own doings are ever before the mind of the
earnest legalist, and such a mind is never at peace. What brings peace is the
knowledge of the grace of God through the work of Christ on the cross, thus
keeping Him ever before us as the Friend who loves us better than anyone else,
and is never weary of us.

As the sense of our responsibility
presses upon us, we find all we need in Him. It is not trying and fearing and
hoping under law, but turning away from all else to Christ, finding in Him
strength and wisdom and every need fully me.

(From Help and Food, Vol.
31.)

The Individual Path of Faith




by C

The life of faith, in its every
step, is intensely individual. No one can have faith for another, and no one
ought to intrude upon another’s path. We may encourage one another to trust God
and to strengthen each other in the Lord. But let us be careful in counseling
another to do this or that unless we discern that there is distinct faith for
it. It is a serious thing to go beyond our depth—to feel the surging of the
tide of circumstances—if our feet are not on the rock. Can you imagine Abraham
asking anyone if it would be "faith or folly" for him to leave Ur of the Chaldees? or Moses asking the advice of others as to his leaving the court of
Pharaoh? We must receive instruction from the Lord and act before Him;
otherwise it will all end in confusion and disaster. Let us act upon the maxim,
"Never go before your faith and never lag behind your conscience."

Let not the persuasive arguments
of a thousand friends induce you to do anything with a doubtful mind. 
"Whatsoever is not of faith is sin" (Rom. 14:23). Look to the Lord
for guidance in every matter. See if you can do it to His glory; if not, lay it
aside.

                    
Responding to Painful

                        
Circumstances

You may be in painful
circumstances while seeking to do the right thing before the Lord. If you
really wait on Him, He will teach you when to speak and when to keep silence.
There is danger of speaking in haste of temper rather than in a spirit of love
when replying to the godless remarks of the unconverted. Further, we must
remember that there is often far more powerful testimony in solemn and
dignified silence than in talking for talking’s sake.

                     
Acting Impulsively

Let us dread to act under mere
impulse. It is always well to be sure of every step we take—to be able to give
a "Thus saith the Lord" for whatever we do or refuse to do. Very much
damage is done to the cause of truth and godliness by impulsive acting. We
greatly value calm, deep-toned decision for Christ—a decision produced by
genuine love to His Person and profound subjection to the authority of His
Word. These things are most needful in this day of man’s will, man’s judgment,
and man’s reason.

Trust Christ and act boldly for
Him. "If your eye be single, your whole body shall be full of light"
(Matt. 6:22). But if you are looking at circumstances, weighing consequences,
or conferring with flesh and blood, your eye is not single and you will be in
darkness and perplexity.

 

"When your eye is
single," that is, when you have but one object before you,
"your whole body also is full of light; but when your eye is evil, your
body also is full of darkness. Take heed, therefore, that the light which is in
you be not darkness. If your whole body therefore be full of light, having no
part dark, the whole shall be full of light, as when the bright shining of a
candle gives you light" (Luke 11:34-36).

How striking the contrast! Instead
of stumbling on the dark mountains, the obedient soul not only has light for
his own path, but he is actually a light-bearer for others. The moral progress
in the above passage is striking. There is first the single eye—the simple,
earnest purpose of heart to go right on in the path of obedience, cost what it
may. Then the body is full of light. But there is more:"If your whole
body therefore be full of light, having no part dark"—no reserve,
no chamber of the heart kept locked up on account of friends, self-interest,
worldly ease, or anything else—"the whole shall be full of light."
Thus you become transparent, and your light shines so that others see it. Not
that you think so, for a single eye never looks at self. If I make it my object
to be a light-bearer, I shall get full of darkness and be a stumbling-block.

Finally, my dear friends, let me
entreat you to yield yourself without reserve to the Word of your Lord. Do not
allow your "friends" to stand in your way. Will your friends answer
for you before the judgment seat of Christ? Can they now fill your heart with
that sweet peace which can only be found in the path of obedience? They do not
deserve the name of friends if they stand in your way in following Christ. May
God lead you forth into that blessed sphere in which you can walk with Him, work
for Him, and find all your springs in Him! To Him we earnestly commend you.

(From Short Papers, Vol. 2,
by C. H. Mackintosh; copyright 1975 by Believers Bookshelf, Sunbury, PA; used
by permission.)

Soul Nourishment First




by George Müller

"Meditate upon these things
… that your profiting may appear to all" (1 Tim. 4:15).

It has pleased the Lord to teach me
a truth, the benefit of which I have not lost for more than 14 years. The point
is this:the first great and primary business to which I ought to attend every
day is to have my soul happy in the Lord. The first thing to be concerned about
is not how much I might serve or glorify the Lord. Rather it is how I might get
my soul into a happy state and how my inner man might be nourished. I might
seek to set the truth before the unconverted, to benefit believers, to relieve
the distressed, or to behave myself in other ways as it becomes a child of God.
But if I am not happy in the Lord and not being nourished and strengthened in
my inner man day by day, these things might not be done in a right spirit.
Before this time my habitual practice had been to give myself to prayer after
having dressed myself in the morning. Now I have seen that the most important
thing I have to do is to give myself to the reading of the Word of God and to
meditation on it, that thus my heart might be comforted, encouraged, warned,
reproved, and instructed. Thus, while meditating upon the Word of God my heart
is brought into experiential communion with the Lord.

I have begun therefore to meditate
on the Scriptures early each morning. The first thing I do, after having asked
in a few words the Lord’s blessing upon His precious Word, is to begin to
meditate on the Word of God, searching as it were into every verse, to get
blessing out of it. This is not for the sake of public ministry of the Word but
for the sake of obtaining food for my own soul. Almost invariably I have found
that after a very few minutes my soul has been led to confession or
thanksgiving or intercession or supplication. Thus, though I do not give myself
to prayer but to meditation, yet it turns almost immediately more or less into
prayer.

Having been for a while making
confession or intercession or supplication, or giving thanks, I go to the next
words or verse, turning all into prayer for myself or others as the Word may
lead to it. All the while I keep before me that the object of my meditation is
food for my own soul. The result of this is that there is always a good deal of
confession, thanksgiving, supplication, or intercession mingled with my
meditation, and then my inner man almost invariably is nourished and
strengthened.

I often find that the Lord is
pleased to use that which He has communicated unto me to minister to other
believers at some later time. This occurs even though it is not for the sake of
public ministry of the Word that I give myself to meditation, but for the
profit of my own inner man.

 

The difference, then, between my
former practice and my present one is this:formerly, when I awakened, I began
to pray as soon as possible, and generally spent almost all my time till
breakfast in prayer. I almost invariably began with prayer except when I felt
my soul to be more than usually barren, in which case I read the Word of God
for food or for refreshment, or for revival and renewal of my inner man, before
I gave myself to prayer. But what was the result? I often spent a quarter of an
hour, or half an hour, or even an hour, on my knees, before being conscious of
having derived comfort, encouragement, humbling of soul, etc., and often after
having suffered much from wandering of mind. I scarcely ever suffer now in this
way. My heart is brought into experiential fellowship with God; I then speak to
my Father and to my Friend (vile though I am and unworthy of it) about the
things that He has brought before me in His precious Word.

It often now astonishes me that I
did not sooner see this point. In no book did I ever read about it. No public
ministry ever brought the matter before me. No private discussion with a
fellow-believer stirred me up to this matter. And yet, now, since God has
taught me this point, it is as plain to me as anything that the first thing the
child of God has to do morning by morning is to obtain food for his inner man.

As the outward man is not fit for
work for any length of time except we take food, and as this is one of the
first things we do in the morning, so it should be with the inner man. What is
the food for the inner man? Not prayer, but the Word of God. Again, it is not
the simple reading of the Word of God, so that it only passes through our
minds, just as water runs through a pipe; rather, it is considering what we
read, pondering over it, and applying it to our hearts.

When we pray, we speak to God. Now
prayer, in order to be continued for any length of time in any other than a
formal manner, requires a measure of godly desire. The season when this
exercise of soul can be most effectually performed is after the inner man has
been nourished by meditation on the Word of God where we find our Father
speaking to us to encourage, comfort, instruct, humble, or reprove us. We may
therefore profitably meditate, with God’s blessing, though we are ever so weak
spiritually. In fact, the weaker we are, the more we need meditation for the
strengthening of our inner man.

Thus there is far less to be
feared from wandering of mind than if we give ourselves to prayer without
having had time previously for meditation. I dwell so particularly on this
point because of the immense spiritual profit and refreshment I am conscious of
having derived from it myself. I affectionately and solemnly beseech all my
fellow believers to ponder this matter. By the blessing of God, I ascribe to
this mode the help and strength which I have had from God to pass in peace
through deeper trials, in various ways, than I had ever had before; and after
having now more than 14 years tried this way, I can most fully, in the fear of
God, commend it.

 

In addition to this, I generally
read, after family prayer, larger portions of the Word of God when I still
pursue my practice of reading regularly onward in the Holy Scriptures,
sometimes in the New Testament, and sometimes in the Old. For more than 26
years I have proved the blessedness of it. I take, also, either then or at
other parts of the day, time more especially for prayer.

What a difference it makes for the
soul to be refreshed and made happy early in the morning, compared to meeting
the service, the decisions, and the trials of the day without spiritual preparation!

Acting Impulsively




by Paul L

Are you one who just lets your
life take its natural course? Do you tend to say or do whatever pops into your head?
Do you act impulsively? Do you live your life without reference to God’s will
for you?

Jesus had been in the wilderness
40 days. He had not eaten all that time. His human body needed food. Satan was
in the wilderness with Jesus, testing and tempting Him in all kinds of ways
(Luke 4:2). "If Thou be the Son of God," said the tempter,
"command that these stones be made bread" (Matt. 4:3).

Who in the world could ever
imagine there was anything wrong with Jesus providing for His food-starved
body? Besides, the suggested means of provision—turning stones into bread—would
in no way take away from or hurt any other person. So why didn’t Jesus do it?

"He answered and said, It is
written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds out
of the mouth of God" (Matt. 4:4). Jesus did not turn stones into bread for
one simple reason:His heavenly Father had not instructed Him to do so!
Throughout His 30 plus years on earth, Jesus never once said or did
anything apart from the will of His Father. "I do always those
things that please [the Father]" (John 8:29). "I seek not My own
will, but the will of the Father who has sent Me" (John 5:30). "I
came down from  heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who
sent Me" (John 6:38). In other words, Jesus never acted
impulsively!

Jesus spent much time in prayer
(Luke 3:21; 11:1; 22:41,44). For example, He spent all night in prayer—no doubt
learning His Father’s will—just before selecting His 12 disciples (Luke
6:12-16). He never acted without first speaking to His Father.

Christ is our example (John 13:15;
Eph. 5:2,25; Phil. 2:5; 1 Pet. 2:21). The three recorded temptations of Christ
by Satan in the wilderness are examples of ways Satan tempts the followers of
Christ. Satan would love to have every Christian go through each day of his or
her life without ever thinking about the question, "What does my heavenly
Father want me to do?" Satan loves it when God’s children act impulsively
without considering the Lord’s will for them.

What are some areas in which we
act impulsively? As starters, that area in which Jesus was tested by Satan had
to do with food. We may be very religious about giving thanks every time we
eat. But how often do we even think of asking the Lord:(a) whether we
should take a second helping (because there is plenty on the table); (b)
whether we should eat certain things (especially if our doctor has told us not
to); or (c) whether we should buy certain foods when we go grocery shopping?

 

Secondly, how about our tongues?
Do we think before we speak? Do we pray before we speak? The Scriptures exhort
us, "Let every man be … slow to speak" (Jas. 1:19). Note how the
Bible refers to man’s strong natural tendency to speak impulsively, without
thinking or praying:"The tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly
evil" (Jas. 3:8).

There is a beautiful example in
the Bible of a man who was asked a question by perhaps the most powerful ruler
in the world. In that split-second before he had to answer his sovereign, this
man, Nehemiah, "prayed to the God of heaven" (Neh. 2:4).

Thirdly, how about the things we
allow into our minds through our eyes and ears? How about the ways we spend our
time? Do we commit our eyes, ears, and time to the Lord? If we get into the
habit of honestly seeking the Lord’s will in prayer before turning on the radio
or television or before surfing the Internet, we often will know instinctively
(by the witness of the Holy Spirit through our new, Christ-like nature) that
God does not want us to do it. Perhaps we purposely avoid praying about these
things because we know deep-down what God will say about them.

Before beginning to pray about the
use of our eyes, ears, and time, let us spend time in the presence of the Lord
drawing up a list of needs we see around us:family members who need our
attention; our Bible that needs to be studied; unsaved persons who need the
gospel; shut-ins who would appreciate a visit, letter, or phone call; depressed
people who need encouragement; backsliders who need to be restored to the Lord;
all the people we know who need prayer; property (our own or that of others)
that needs to be maintained or fixed up. This way, when we pray about the use
of our time, the Holy Spirit can easily direct us to attending to the needs
around us.

May the Lord help each of His own
to become more aware of our tendency to act impulsively. And may we follow the
example of Christ our Creator, Pattern, and Redeemer in reminding ourselves and
our tempter, "I must live by every word that proceeds out of the mouth of
God."

Communion




by H

The Song of Solomon has been
called the book of communion. We have that beautifully set forth in the first
seven verses of the second chapter. The bride and the bridegroom are conversing
together. We delight to speak with those whom we love. One of the wonderful
things about love is that when someone has really filled the vision of your
soul, you do not feel that any time that is taken up communing with him is
wasted. Here then you have the lovers in the country together and she exclaims,
for it is evidently she who speaks in verse one:"I am the rose of Sharon, and the lily of the valleys." Generally we apply those words to the blessed
Lord; we speak of Him as the Rose of Sharon. We sing sometimes, "He’s the
Lily of the Valley, He’s the Bright and Morning Star." It is perfectly
right and proper to apply all these delightful figures to Him, for we cannot
find any figure that speaks of that which is beautiful and of good report that
cannot properly be applied to the Lord. But the wonderful thing is that He has
put His own beauty upon His people. And so here the bride is looking up into
the face of the bridegroom saying, "I am the rose [really the narcissus, a
blood-red flower] of Sharon, and the lily of the valleys"—the lily that
thrives in the hidden place, not in the town, not in the heart and bustle of
the city, but out on the cool countryside, in the quiet field. Does it not
speak of the soul’s separation to Christ Himself?

 

It is when we draw apart from the
things of the world, apart to Himself, that we really thrive and grow in grace
and become beautiful in His sight. I am afraid that many of us do not develop
spiritually as we should because of the fact that we know so little of this
heart-separation to Himself. One of the great griefs that comes to the heart of
many a one who is seeking to lead others on in the ways of Christ is to know
the influence that the world has upon them after they are converted to God. How
often the question comes from young Christians, "Must I give up this and
must I give up that if I am going to live a consistent Christian life?"
And the things that they speak of with such apparent yearning are mere trifles
after all as compared with communion with Him. Must I give up eating sawdust in
order to enjoy a good dinner? Who would talk like that? Must I give up the
pleasures of the world in order that I may have communion with Christ? It is
easy to let them all go if the soul is enraptured with Him; and when you get to
know Him better, when you learn to enjoy communion with Him, you will find
yourself turning the question around. So when the world says, "Won’t you
participate with us in this doubtful pleasure or in this unholy thing?"
your answer will be, "Must I give up so much to come down to that level?
Must I give up communion with Him? Must I give up the enjoyment of His Word?
Must I give up fellowship with His people in order to go in the ways of the
world?" Dear Christian, do not think of it as giving up anything to
go apart with Him and enjoy His blessed fellowship.

 

In the Desert with God




In these days of hurry and bustle, we find ourselves face to face with a<br /> terrible danger—no time to be alone with God

In these days of hurry and bustle,
we find ourselves face to face with a terrible danger—no time to be alone with
God. The world in these last days is running fast; we live in what is called
"the age of progress." "You know we must keep pace with the
times," so the world says. [Ed. note:This was written 95 years ago!] But
this spirit of the world has not confined itself to the world. It is, alas, to
be found among the saints of God. And what is the result? No time to be alone
with God. And this is followed by no inclination to be alone with God.
Can there be any condition more deplorable than the condition of a child of God
who has no inclination to be alone with his Father?

Nowadays how many of God’s dear
children have picked up the "spirit of the age"; and how many
Christians are pushed into service for God, or thrust themselves into it, who
have had no "apprenticeship," no desert training. They have taken a
terrible short-cut into the front of the battle, a short-cut that has cut off
entirely the school of God!

How different is this from what
meets our eye in the pages of our Father’s Book. If we look at Abraham, we find
him sweetly communing with his God, far away in the plains of Mamre, sitting in
his tent door in the heat of the day (Gen. 18:1), while his worldly nephew is
keeping pace with the spirit of the age in ungodly Sodom. We find Joseph at
least two full years in God’s school—although it be an Egyptian dungeon—before
he steps up to teach her "senators wisdom" (Psa. 105:22) and
"save much people alive" (Gen. 50:20).

We find Moses at God’s school in
the back side of the desert (Exod. 3:1). Then, but not till then, he appears
publicly as the deliverer of the people of God. For David also the wilderness
is the school of God. There he slays the lion and the bear (1 Sam. 17:34-36)
when no human eye is near. He gets the victory alone with God. Fresh from God’s
school, he steps before the thousands of Israel; and while all Israel follows
Saul, the people’s man, trembling, there is one who trembles not, and he is the
one who has been at God’s school in the wilderness alone with Himself. Little
wonder, then, that the Lord wrought a great victory in Israel that day!



We might multiply instances from
the Book of God. We might tell of Elijah, a bold witness for God, who was
longer alone with his God than standing in the place of public testimony. He
found the solitude of Cherith and the quiet seclusion of Zarephath (1 Ki.
17:3,9) a needed training before he delivered the messages of God. John the
Baptist was in the deserts till the day of his showing unto Israel (Luke 1:80).
The apostle Paul’s journey to Arabia seems to have been for no other purpose
than to be at God’s school in the desert (Gal. 1:17). But from the instances we
have noticed, nothing can be clearer than this, that if you and I are to be of
any use to God down here—if we would glorify Him on the earth—we must have time
to be alone with Him.

Whoever or whatever is put off,
God must not be put off. Whether we are "gifted" or not
"gifted," every one of us must have time alone with God. It is in the
closet that the "lions" and the "bears" must be slain. It
is in the secret presence of God, with no one near but Him, that the spiritual
Agags must be brought out and hewn in pieces before the Lord in Gilgal (1 Sam.
15:33). Then, when we appear before our brethren or the world, we shall find
ours to be the "strong confidence" which is the portion of all who
have to do with God in secret. The "Goliaths" shall be slain; God’s
work shall be done. We need not fear that God will not use us. It is only by
being in God’s school that He can use us—not perhaps in the dazzling way that
the world and many Christians admire, but in His own way, in a way that will
most honor Him.

The Lord makes all these things
clear to us while we are alone with Himself. It is only then we really do God’s
work, it is only then we do it in God’s way, it is only then we do the very
things God has fitted us for and at the very time appointed of the Father. What
secrets we get from the Lord alone with Himself! If we do not care for the
secret of His presence, what does He care for all our boasted service! It is
ourselves He wants, and it is only service flowing out of the joy of His
presence that is worthy of the name. It is only such service that shall stand
the fire of the judgment seat, and bring joy in the day of Christ that we have
not run in vain nor labored in vain.

May each one of us have an open
ear to the Master’s voice when He says to us, "Come ye yourselves apart
into a desert place" (Mark 6:31), remembering that though He were the Son
of the Father, we find Him time after time departing "into a solitary
place," and there praying, although in doing so He had to get up a
"great while before day" (Mark 1:35). The faithful witness Himself,
as well as His faithful and trusted servants in every age, required a desert
experience—a wilderness teaching alone with God. Beloved, so do we!

(From Help and Food, Vol.
21.)

The Sermon on the Mount:Does It Apply Now?




by John Bloore

Does the teaching of Christ in the
Sermon on the Mount (Matt. 5-7) apply to the children of God today? I suggest
an affirmative answer to this question for reasons that I will now present.

In the passage referred to, the
Lord unfolds the moral character and principles that are to govern the action
and relation of His disciples in a time preceding the thousand-year reign of
Christ over the earth. It is plain that much of the Lord’s teaching has in view
a time of suffering, rejection, and persecution—conditions such as we know in
the present age, not those of the time when the glory of the kingdom fills the
earth. The kingdom in glory could not come without a people being prepared for
the Lord. The Lord’s teaching makes plain the moral character and holy
principles that govern those to whom the kingdom in reality belongs, whether
viewed in its aspect of present spiritual blessing, or of future manifestation
in glory in either the earthly or heavenly spheres.

The Lord’s rejection was a matter
of prophecy, with His ascension to God’s right hand and later coming in glory;
therefore an interval must be contemplated between His first coming as
"born King of the Jews" (Matt. 2:2) and the actual setting up of that
heavenly kingdom of which Daniel prophesied (7:13,14). What, then, did the
message mean that both John the Baptist and the Lord delivered, "The
kingdom of heaven is at hand" (Matt. 3:2; 4:17; 10:7)?

First, it is evident that the King
Himself had come. His works of power witnessed to Him. He was Master over all
creation, and of Satan too. Yet He was rejected—"His own received Him
not" (John 1:11). Did this necessitate the postponement of the announced
kingdom, or put in abeyance what would have then been set up if He, the King,
had been treated otherwise? No, for there was the predetermined purpose of God
to be fulfilled in any case.

It was not His purpose to set up at
that time
the kingdom in glory, for it could only come when the Son of Man
should come from heaven. The nation of Israel, because of their fleshly desires
and carnal interpretations, were entirely mistaken in their expectations. They
had missed God’s mind in at least one important feature as made known in the
Old Testament. This was one reason they saw no beauty in Jesus that they should
desire Him (Isa. 53:2), and in due time their cry was, "Away with
Him" (John 19:15). He was not the man to rule over them.

 

It seems clear then that no matter
what the Jews expected, it was not the kingdom in glory that was being
proclaimed as near. God’s purposes were in process of accomplishment, and the
test for Israel in particular, yet also for the world, at this juncture, was
not whether they would have the kingdom in glory but whether they would have
God’s King of that kingdom. He was rejected. Did that mean that the
kingdom He announced as at hand was pushed off into the distant future? No; it
came, now exists, and in the form that was according to the purpose of God for
that foreshadowed interval which continues until the coming of the Son of Man
in the clouds of heaven to take His own throne. In its present form, as fully
revealed in the Lord’s parables, it fills the interval of which we have spoken,
and then continues in its form of manifested glory and power in what is called
the kingdom of the Son of Man.

What is the present form of
the kingdom that fills this interval? Its moral character, governing principles,
and condition in various ways is what very largely made up the Lord’s teaching.
To this belong the mysteries of the kingdom, those similitudes found in the
parables, and "things new and old" (Matt. 13:52). The kingdom in this
form embraces all who profess allegiance to Christ. Such are responsible to
show conformity to the moral character that the King Himself made known in His
teaching concerning the kingdom. This is surely to find manifestation in and
among those who gather together unto His name—His disciples. To them in
particular the Sermon on the Mount (Matt. 5-7) is addressed.

The kingdom of heaven was at hand
during the Lord’s ministry on earth. It actually came when in resurrection He
could proclaim that all power in heaven and on earth was His (Matt. 28:19,20),
though that still did not mean the immediate restoration of the kingdom to
Israel (Acts 1:6,7). For during the course of the kingdom that had now come in
there were other purposes to be fulfilled that were not made known until the
apostle Paul was raised up to reveal the mystery of Christ and the Church (Eph.
3:9,10). The kingdom of heaven is not the Church, which is the body of Christ,
but this Church is in the kingdom. The kingdom embraces Christendom, the sphere
of profession which may be real or not; but all true disciples of the
kingdom since Pentecost and until the rapture (1 Thess. 4:13-18) are in the
body of Christ which is the Church.

 

Now whatever may be the high and
heavenly calling and position of the Church as revealed by Paul, it remains
true that the assembly of those who are gathered together unto Christ’s name,
whether before or after the conversion and apostolic ministry of Saul/Paul, is
that company in which the kingdom should find manifestation in its moral and spiritual
features and holy principles as made known by the King. This remains true, no
matter what higher and more intimate relation Church truth makes known. In
fact, all the practical teaching of the Epistles is in agreement with and only
emphasizes that of the Lord Himself in relation to the character and conduct of
disciples of His kingdom. These teachings of the Lord may be too little
observed and heeded as applying to practical Christian walk by those who firmly
hold to the truth of the Church and Christ its Head in heaven. Surely we,
of all people, should show ourselves good citizens of the kingdom of the
heavens, "for our commonwealth has its existence in the heavens
(Phil. 3:20, JND). The following Scriptures make mention of the kingdom as
having a present application:Rom. 14:16-18; Eph. 5:5-10; Col. 1:13; 2 Pet.
1:10,11; Rev. 1:5,6,9.

With these considerations before
us, we may see that while parts of our Lord’s teaching may primarily relate to
Israel (Matt. 13:44), or to the nations (Matt. 13:47-50), or to the time after
the removal of the Church when another Jewish remnant will be raised up (Matt.
10:22,23; 24:3-32), or to the Church itself (Matt. 13:45,46; 16:18; 18:20; John
10:13-17), yet there is that which applies in moral and spiritual ways to the
believer today. This is true even where the reference is evidently to the
millennial form of the kingdom as in Matt. 5:5 ("the meek … shall
inherit the earth"), for is not the earth part of Christ’s
inheritance, and are not those who now believe co-heirs with Christ (Rom.
8:17)? Hence may not even such a word apply to those who as meek do not put
forth present claim as to inheritance here, but await the hour when He takes
possession as the Son of Man, the appointed Heir of all things (Psa. 8:6-8; Heb.
2:7,8)? Surely it is so, even though they are distinctly heavenly in destiny as
the body and the bride.

A further question is asked,
"Is a man not saved if there is no mercy in him?" the reference being
to the fifth beatitude—"Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive
mercy" (Matt. 5:7). Now God is rich in mercy, and those who are His
children are to be imitators of Him (Eph. 2:4; 5:1). To find a man implacable,
merciless, unforgiving, unmercifully pursuing the erring, refusing to show mercy
and forgiveness to those who have injured him, raises serious question as to
whether that man’s sin-hardened soul has ever been softened by the blessed
inflow of God’s mercy meeting his own great need as ungodly and without
strength, no matter how loud the profession of the lips. It is by his fruits
that we know the real, the true believer. In this both Paul and James agree.
That believers should be merciful is to be expected. That alone is consistent
with the knowledge of how God has been rich in mercy for them. Thus they will
glorify their Father who is in heaven, and receive mercy according to His
perfect love and interest in His children, while also to show mercy to another
is the sure way to reap it in our own time of need. Not to show mercy is to
lack in righteousness, which is to act in consistency with the place we are in
and the way we have been put into it (see Matt. 18:21-35).

"Be ye therefore merciful as
your Father also is merciful" (Luke 6:36). "Put on therefore …
bowels of mercies, kindness, humbleness of mind" (Col. 3:12).

(From Help and Food, Vol.
46.)

Legality and Levity




by C

Let us consider a word of warning
against two opposite evils that are working among Christians at the present
time. These are legality on the one hand and levity on the other.

The first of these evils, taking
up the law as a rule of life, is dishonoring to God and utterly subversive of
one’s peace and liberty. It is needful to set forth the free grace of God, the
value of the blood of Christ, the standing of the believer before God in
perfect righteousness and acceptance in Christ. These precious truths, when
applied to the heart in the power of the Holy Spirit, must deliver it from all
legal influences.

But it frequently happens that
persons, when apparently delivered from legality, run into the opposite evil of
levity. This may arise from the fact that the doctrines of grace are only taken
up intellectually, instead of being wrought into the soul by the power of the
Spirit of God. A great amount of evangelical truth may be taken up in a very
light way by persons in whom there has been no deep work of conscience, no real
breaking down of nature, no thorough subjugation of the flesh in the presence
of God. When this is the case there is sure to be levity of spirit in some form
or another. There will be a very wide margin allowed for worldliness of various
kinds—a liberty given to nature wholly incompatible with practical
Christianity. In addition to these things, there will be exhibited a very
deplorable lack of conscience in the practical details of daily life—duties
neglected, work badly done, engagements not faithfully observed, sacred
obligations trifled with, debts contracts, extravagant habits indulged. All
these things we place under the head of levity, and they are, alas! too common
among the very highest professors of what is termed evangelical truth.

Now we deeply deplore this and
would desire to have our own souls, as well as the souls of all our Christian
readers, really exercised before God about it. We fear there is a great deal of
hollow profession among us, a great want of earnestness, truthfulness, and
reality in our ways. We are not sufficiently permeated by the spirit of genuine
Christianity, or governed in all things by the Word of God. Thus the soul gets
into a bad state, conscience does not act, moral sensibilities become blunted,
the claims of truth are not responded to, positive evil is trifled with, and
moral relaxation is allowed. So far from there being the constraining
power of the love of Christ, leading forth in the activities of goodness, there
is not even the restraining power of the fear of God keeping back from
the activities of evil.

 

We appeal solemnly to the
consciences of our readers as to these things. The present is a deeply solemn
time for Christians. There is a demand for earnest, deep-toned devotedness to
Christ; but this cannot possibly exist where the common claims of practical
righteousness are neglected. We must ever remember that the self-same grace
which effectually delivers the soul from legality is the only safeguard against
all levity. We have done very little for a person, if anything at all, if we
bring him/her out of a legal state into a light, easy-going, careless,
unconscientious condition of heart. And yet we have frequently marked the
history of souls and noticed that when they were delivered out of darkness and
bondage they became far less tender and sensitive. The flesh is ever ready to
turn the grace of God into lasciviousness, and therefore it must be subdued.

It is necessary for the power of
the Cross to be applied to all that is of the flesh. We need those deep
spiritual exercises that result from positive entrance into the power of the
sufferings of Christ. We need to meditate more profoundly upon the death of
Christ.

The Cross, beloved reader, is at
once the cure for both legality and levity. Christ "gave Himself for our
sins, that He might deliver us from this present evil world, according to the
will of God and our Father" (Gal. 1:4). By the Cross the believer is as
completely delivered from this present evil world as he is forgiven his sins.
He is not saved in order that he may enjoy the world, but that he may get done
with it entirely. We know few things more dangerous for the soul than the
combination of evangelical truth with worldliness, ease, and self-indulgence
… the adoption of a certain phraseology of truth where the conscience is not
in the presence of God … a merely intellectual apprehension of standing
without any earnest dealing with the practical state … clearness of
doctrine as to title without any conscientious reference to the moral
condition.

We trust our readers will allow
the word of exhortation. It is not an agreeable task to call attention to
practical evils, to urge the solemn duty of self-judgment, to press upon the
conscience the claims of practical godliness. But there are times when the
true, practical condition of things among Christians weights heavily upon the
heart and rouses the soul to make an urgent appeal to conscience in reference to
matters of walk and conduct; I believe the present to be such a time. (Ed.
note:This was written well over 100 years ago! How much more needed it is
today!) The devil is ever busy and on the alert. The Lord has granted much
light upon His Word for some years past. The gospel has been brought out with
particular clarity and power. Thousands have been delivered from a legal state.
And now the enemy is seeking to hinder the testimony by leading souls into a
light, careless, carnal condition—leading them to neglect the wholesome and
indispensable exercise of self-judgment. It is the deep sense of this that has
suggested a word of warning on "Legality and Levity."

(From Miscellaneous Writings,
Vol. 6, Loizeaux Brothers, Neptune, NJ; used by permission.)

The Golden Rule




by William Kelly

"Therefore all things
whatsoever you would that men should do to you, do you even so to them:for
this is the law and the prophets" (Matt. 7:12).

This is in no way dealing with men
according to their ways, but the contrary. It is saying, as it were, "You
who know the heavenly Father, who know what His grace to the evil is, you know
what is comely in His sight; always act upon that. Never act merely according
to what another does toward you, but according to what you would that another
should do to you. If you have the slightest love in your heart, you would
desire that they should act as "the children of your Father who is in
heaven" (Matt. 5:45). Whatever other persons may do, my business is to do
to them what I would that they should do to me, namely, to act in a way
becoming the child of a heavenly Father. "This is the law and the
prophets." He is giving them exceeding breadth, extracting the essence of
all that was blessed there. This was clearly the gracious wish of a soul that
knew God, even under the law; and nothing less than this could be the ground of
action before God.

(From Lectures on the Gospel of
Matthew
.)

He Is Coming




He is coming

He is coming! our Beloved!

We shall soon behold His face,

Who hath filled our earthen
vessels

With the treasures of His grace;

Who, through all our desert
journey,

Leadeth onward by the light,

O’er the path of faith that
shineth

Through the watches of the night.

 

He is coming! we are looking

For the Day-star in the sky,

And the groaning creature waiteth

The Redeemer from on high:

For He comes to purge His kingdom,

And His sovereign throne to take—

Bid the sword of God in judgment

And avenging power awake.

 

But, ere judgment-seals are
opened,

He will come from off the throne,

With the voice of the archangel

Home to gather all His own.

And the saints of all the ages

His redeeming shout shall hear—

Quick and death, o’er death
triumphing,

Shall in glorious life appear.

 

All who trod faith’s pilgrim
pathway

In the ages that have passed,

Every promise of Jehovah

Shall reap blessedly at last;

And the bride, made meet divinely

For His glory by His grace,

Shall behold, beyond the desert,

Her Beloved face to face!



When redemption’s song resoundeth

O’er creation’s vast domain,

Every tongue shall tribute render

To the Lamb that once was slain—

Judah’s Lion, God’s Anointed,

Lord of all, by all confessed,

Heir of all, shall all inherit—

Satan shall be dispossessed!

 

From the heavenlies, foiled,
defeated,

All his power on high o’erpast,

The accuser of the brethren

With his angels shall be cast.

To the earth the foe malignant

Shall in vengeful wrath descend,

For he knoweth his dominion

Draweth near its doomful end.

 

But, ere dawneth earth’s
redemption,

Comes a night of utter woe:

Unrestrained, the power satanic

As a flood shall overflow.

Though the "everlasting
gospel"

Coming judgment maketh known,

In rebellious pride the creature

The Creator would dethrone.

 

For the worship due Jehovah

Shall the antichrist demand;

Then apostate Jew and Gentile

God shall smite with wrathful hand:

And when passed the tribulation,

And while men’s hearts fail for
fear,

On the clouds of heaven coming

Shall the Son of Man appear.

 

He will come in kingly glory,

And omnipotent in might,

To redeem His earthly people,

And his enemies to smite.

He will come as the Avenger

Of unrighteousness, of blood,

And in fury tread the winepress

Of the holy wrath of God.

 

He will come His purchased kingdom

To redeem from Satan’s sway,

And the nations’ hosts embattled

With the sword divine shall slay:

Sin’s dominion shall be broken,



And the arch-deceiver chained,

And the Light shall shed its glory

Where the power of darkness
reigned.

 

Richly blessing and fulfilling

Every promise to His own,

King of kings He’ll reign in Zion—

David’s Son on David’s throne;

And the nations, yielding homage

Unto God’s anointed King,

Shall their glory and their honor

To His glorious city bring.

 

From the holy, heavenly city

There shall living waters flow,

And the Tree of Life perennial

Shall its healing leaves bestow;

And to utmost isles of ocean,

And from shore to farthest shore,

The Sun of Righteousness o’er all

Its gladdening beams shall pour.

 

In the light and love begotten

Of the knowledge of the Lord,

All kindreds of the earth shall
dwell

In peace and blest accord:

And the jubilant hosanna

That a glorious Israel raise

Shall before His throne commingle

With the Gentile songs of praise.

 

When the Second Man assumeth

Over all His sovereign sway,

All defiling blight shall vanish,

And the curse be done away.

Earth shall yield in blest
profusion;

Every creature-groan shall cease;

All creation bask in blessing

‘Neath His benison of peace.

 

Ah, but e’en the age of blessing

And of glories that transcend,

Shall, like every age preceding,

At the last in judgment end.

For the carnal seed of Adam,

Born in sin, and sin-defiled,

Still impenitent remaineth,

And to God unreconciled.

 

E’en Messiah’s reign millennial,



Though restraining, judging sin,

All unrighteousness suppressing,

Changeth not the heart within.

And the hosts at heart disloyal,

(Though they have obedience
feigned)

Swell the rebel ranks of Satan

When on earth again unchained.

 

Long the fight ‘tween Light and
Darkness

Over all earth’s ages spread,

But the Woman’s Seed shall surely

Bruise at last the serpent’s head.

And when darkness’ power embattled

Dares contest God’s sovereign
claim,

Fire divine in judgment endeth

Earth’s sad tale of sin and shame.

 

But of man’ neath sin’s dominion

Shall the direful fruit be shown,

When the dead, arraigned for
judgment,

Stand before the great white
throne.

Long hath God forborne with evil,

But ’twill reap its due at last,

When the wicked from His presence

Are in outer darkness cast.

 

Power and place supreme were given

Unto the Incarnate Son,

Things on earth and things in
heaven

All to reconcile in one.

All the will Divine accomplished—

All destroyed that held in thrall—

Christ delivers up the kingdom:

God shall then be all in all.

 

For redemption’s full fruition

Lies beyond time’s little span;

God Himself will tabernacle

In eternity with man.

All things new, behold! He maketh;

Former things will pass away;

O’er new heavens and earth
irradiant

Dawneth God’s eternal day!

 

And the sons of
God angelic,

Who acclaimed
earth’s primal morn,

Shall rejoice
with joy exultant

O’er a fallen
world re-born.

They had seen
God’s gracious purpose

Through the
rolling years unfold,

Now the
glorious consummation



They’ll
adoringly behold.

 

New Jerusalem!
God’s city!

Grace enthroned
in light divine,

Shall through
never-ending ages

Tho His praise
and glory shine.

And within its
pearly portals

Ransomed myriads
shall adore—

All the glories
of Immanuel,

Blest beholding,
evermore!

 

And the earth,
in new creation—

Blest abode,
divinely fair—

Shall in holy,
blest communion

God’s eternal
Sabbath share.

And the songs
of earth and heaven

Shall as
fragrant incense blend,

Gladsome praise
and glory giving,

That shall
never, never end.

 

O beloved, He
is coming!

We shall soon
behold His face,

And in highest
heights of glory

Learn how deep
the depths of grace.

All the
triumphs and the glories

Of our souls’
Beloved we’ll see—

But o’er all
His crowning glory

Evermore the Cross
will be!

 

     (From Help
and Food
, Vol. 38.)

The Church in a Day of Ruin (Part 8)



                 Characteristics of the Early

                   Church:Church Discipline

The discipline of sinners has in
large measure become a thing of the past in the Christian Church. Under the
plea of love, tolerance, and not judging (Matt. 7:1), just about any kind of
sin—except the "sin" of intolerance—is permitted in many local
churches. However, there are many passages in the New Testament that clearly
show God-given authority for discipline in the local church. For example, the
apostle Paul passed judgment on the man in Corinth who was committing
fornication, and urged the Corinthian Assembly to do the same (1 Cor. 5:3-5).
We shall now discuss the several different kinds and degrees of discipline
described in the New Testament, each designed to deal with a particular kind or
degree of sin.

Dealing with Those Who Have
Faults
. "Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, you who are
spiritual, restore such a one in the spirit of meekness" (Gal. 6:1). This
particularly falls under the responsibilities of an overseer (see Jan.-Feb.
1999 Words of Truth). However, the person most responsible for going to
the erring one and pointing out his/her fault or sin is the one who is aware of
the offense.

The Lord might even use a child,
like Samuel (1 Sam. 3:11-18), to point out the sin of an old­er person. A
prison inmate serving a life sentence once told me of the time his pre-teen son
pleaded with him to stop his life of drugs and crime. He ruefully added that he
did not listen to his son, and shortly thereafter a botched burglary ended in
his committing a murder.

Why is "a spirit of
meekness" required in restoring such a one? And why does it say, "considering
yourself, lest you also be tempted"? Meekness is the attitude that
receives reproof or insult or injury without defending self and without
retaliating or avenging the offense. He who dares to confront one
"overtaken in a fault" to "restore such a one" must have a
very realistic view of his own past sins and his capability of sinning as much
as or more than the one he is seeking to restore. The restorer faces a very
real danger:the sinner may resent the intrusion into his business and may begin
throwing the past sins of the restorer in his face. If the restorer is not
possessed with meekness, he may totally ruin his opportunity to restore his
brother by responding to the attack in a defensive or even offensive and sinful
way. The ideal response may be, "Yes, you certainly are right about those
sins that I once committed. My life was a mess at one time. But the Lord has
restored me to Himself and has blessed me greatly and given me much peace and
joy. The reason I have come to you is because I want you to have the joy of
your salvation restored to you" (Psa. 51:12).



Dealing with the Unruly.
"Warn those who are unruly" (1 Thess. 5:14). The "unruly"
here are those believers who are neglecting their God-given responsibilities in
the home, at work, or in the assembly. It includes those who are not working
and are getting into other people’s business instead of trying to find a job,
doing volunteer work, helping others, or serving the Lord (2 Thess. 3:11,12).

Dealing with Heretics.
"A man who is a heretic after the first and second admonition reject [or
avoid]" (Tit. 3:10; also Rom. 16:17). A heretic is not necessarily one who
teaches wrong doctrine but one who tries to form a party or sect around a
particular doctrine or issue or himself. The best way for everyone to deal with
such a person is to avoid him as the verse in Titus tells us. Without any
followers after his cause, he will either leave and go elsewhere or be quiet.

Dealing with a Person Who Con­tinues
in Sin
. "If your brother sins against you, go, reprove him between you
and him alone:if he hear you, you have gained your brother" (Matt. 18:15
JND). This may be either a sin that has been committed per­sonally against you
or one that you have witnessed or been told of. So far this is like Gal. 6:1.
If your broth­er confesses his sin and stops doing it, your job is well done
and you need not carry the matter further. Or if he gives evidence that he was
misunderstood or falsely accused, the matter is over unless new evidence of his
wrong-doing comes to light.

"But if he will not hear you,
then take with you one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses
every word may be established. And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it
unto the church; but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto you as
an heathen man and a publican" (Matt. 18:16,17). Here is the scriptural
procedure if the sinning brother justifies his sinful deed or continues in his
sin. It may not have been a huge sin—like adultery or stealing or being drunk
(1 Cor. 5:11)—to begin with. But if it is not confessed, it raises a barrier
between himself and the others in the church, as well as between himself and
God. If the sin is continued, he is behaving like "a heathen man" and
the local as­sem­bly has authority from God to put him out of fellowship (Matt.
18:18).

Dealing with an Elder Who Sins.
"Against an elder receive not an accusation but before two or three
witnesses. Those who sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear" (1
Tim. 5:10,20). When an elder or overseer sins, the procedure given in Matt.
18:15-17 does not seem to apply. Because of the responsible position the sinner
occupies in the local assembly, his sin calls for public rebuke. At the same
time, if his sin is not confirmed by at least two or three witnesses, then the
matter should be kept quiet until there is sufficient witness.



Dealing with a Wicked Person.
"Put away from among yourselves that wicked person" (1 Cor. 5:13).
There once was a man in the assembly at Corinth, Greece who was committing
fornication. It was not an isolated act but a sin-pattern that was widely known
in the community (1 Cor. 5:1). Due to the public nature of this sin, the steps
of Matt. 18:15-17 were not applicable. Since the man remained unrepentant, the
entire church was to excommunicate him or deny Christian fellowship to him.

Such extreme action is not to be
limited to those who commit sexual sins. The apostle Paul writes, "Now I
have written unto you not to keep company if any man that is called a brother
be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an
extortioner; with such a one, no, not to eat" (1 Cor. 5:12).
Excommunication for false teaching, such as concerning the person and work of
Christ, may also be called for if instruction, admonition, and other forms of
discipline fail (1 Tim. 1:19,20; 2 Tim. 2:16-21; 2 John 10; compare Gal. 5:9,10
with 1 Cor. 5:6,7).

How does a local assembly go about
deciding on and carrying out such discipline? A guideline is given in 1
Corinthians 5:"In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when you are
gathered together" (verse 4). This expression "gathered
together" is the same in the Greek as that in Matt. 18:20. As noted in the
July-Aug. 1998 issue of Words of Truth, putting people out and receiving
people into fellowship is not the work of a clergyman, nor the work of a body
of elders or deacons, but the work of the assembly as a whole, as
"gathered together" "in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ."
The great value and power of assembly discipline and other assembly decisions
derives from being gathered around the Lord who guides their decisions
and ratifies them in heaven (Matt. 18:18).

Dealing with an Excommunicated
Person
. How is the one who is excommunicated to be treated by others in the
assembly? There are two clues given in 1 Corinthians 5:"Deliver such an
one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh" and "with such a
one, no, not to eat" (verses 5 and 11). All kinds of social and spiritual
fellowship with the wicked person are to be avoided. He/she has behaved like an
unsaved person and is to be treated as such, only more severely because of
his/her profession of being saved. The sinner is made to experience the poverty
of soul and spirit that comes from having no fellowship in things pertaining to
God and His Word. (This may be what delivering unto Satan entails.)

There are differing opinions
(Scripture does not seem to pronounce on it) as to whether an excommunicated
person should even be permitted to sit in on meetings of the local assembly. If
such a person does come to meeting, the others in the assembly must be very
careful not to engage in social or spiritual fellowship with that person,
according to 1 Corinthians 5.



Restoring an Excommunicated
Person
. The purpose of putting wick­ed brothers or sisters out of fellow­ship
is not to get rid of them. Rather, it is to help them to learn the seri­ousness
of the sin with sincere hope and prayer for their repentance and restoration to
the Lord (1 Cor. 5:5; 1 Tim. 1:20). To this end, while there is the avoidance
of fellowship with the wicked person, there needs to be continual prayer by the
assembly and periodic communication with him/her by one or more brothers in
order to ascertain true repentance and  restoration to the Lord.

The Corinthian Assembly had to be
pushed by the apostle Paul to "put away from among [them]selves that
wicked person" (1 Cor. 5:13). When it became evident that the man had
sincerely repented of his sin, they again had to be pushed by Paul to
"forgive him and comfort him, lest perhaps such a one should be swallowed
up with overmuch sorrow" and to "confirm [their] love toward
him" (2 Cor. 2:6-8).

When the sinner has truly repented
of his sin and been restored to the Lord, it is time for the assembly to take
action to restore that brother and sister to full fellowship. But how can
sincere repentance of one’s sin and true restoration to the Lord be discerned
by the assembly? For this I quote another:"Thank God, there is a bright
side when, after [the assembly’s] faithfulness in the path of duty, there is
the joy of seeing the wanderer restored. We can almost feel the thrill of the
apostle’s gladness as he wrote of the recovered brother, `I am filled with
comfort, I am exceeding joyful in all our tribulation’ (2 Cor. 7:4).

"Restoration is what was
prayed for, hoped for, expected. While one put away is to be let alone, this
does not preclude the thought of prayer for him, and looking after him after
the lapse of some time.  Especially should this be done if he appears to be
bowing to the Lord’s judgment. Of course, those who put a bold face on it, or
who continue in sin, can only be left in God’s hands.

"Marks of true recovery are
very plain. There will be a sense of sin against God (Psa. 5:4), a
judging of the root of it, a submission to God’s governmental dealing, even
when undue severity may have been used by the saints. If there was trespass
against any, the wrong will be righted as far as possible—the dishonest gains
refunded and the bitter, false accusations withdrawn; also, we need hardly add,
the sin will be forsaken. Until there is restoration to communion with God
there can be no true restoration to the assembly. The steps in the
reinstatement of the cleansed leper (Leviticus 14) to his privileges are
instructive in this connection. It was the priest who was to examine the healed
man, and the various rites in his restoration are most suggestive of complete
recovery.



"It will be noticed that the
leper, even after his restoration to the worship of God, `remained abroad out
of his tent seven days’; it suggests that even after personal recovery an
interval may elapse before the person is restored to his privileges in the
assembly. There are many reasons for this:if the offense has been glaring or
disgraceful, it is fitting that the world should see the genuineness of the
repentance. It will not hurt, but deepen in the individual a sense of his sin.
In addition to this, it is well to remember that the tender consciences of the
saints have been sorely wounded, and the offender will gladly allow time for
the healing of the shock inflicted. Anything like insistence upon his immediate
reception after confession, or resentment at delay, would show that the work in
his soul lacks completeness.

"On the other hand, the
assembly needs to guard against a hard, unforgiving spirit. When the
consciences of all are satisfied, there should not be needless delay in
confirming their love to their recovered brother. `Sufficient to such a man is
this punishment which was inflicted of many. So that contrariwise you ought
rather to forgive him’ (2 Cor. 2:6-8). How gracious, how loving, and yet how
holy, are these directions!

"And may we not add that when
the restored brother is again in his place, his sin is not to be remembered?
True, he will not forget it; but shall the others, by look or manner,
betray lack of confidence? Ah, we are too much like the world which `forgives,
but cannot forget.’ Neither can we say such a one must keep silence and never
again expect to be used of the Lord. It was Peter, the wandering sheep, who was
made a shepherd for others (John 21:15,17). When David was restored he would
teach transgressors God’s ways (Psa. 51:13). He will walk softly the rest of
his days, a chastened person, but a happy and a useful member of the body of
Christ." (From The Church and Its Order According to Scripture by
S. Ridout, Loizeaux, Neptune, NJ 07753.)

Preventive Discipline.
Perhaps some of the problems that call for church discipline might be avoided
if more care were taken in receiving brothers and sisters into fellowship in
the first place. "Lay hands suddenly on no man" (1 Tim. 5:22) is a
verse to consider in this regard.

Other aspects of assembly
discipline, including the question of what to do if the local assembly is
unwilling to take action in a matter calling for discipline, will be considered
in a subsequent issue.

Appendix on "Judge
Not."
We have just described several different kinds of judgments to
be made by the church against sinners. So what does the verse mean that says,
"Judge not, that you be not judged" (Matt. 7:1)?

Here are some suggestions as to
what we should not judge:

1. The context of chapter 6
is earthly riches. The preceding verse says, "Take … no thought for the
morrow" (6:34). The Christian who has (or thinks he has) forsaken all to
follow Christ should not stand in judgment on the believer who still is
wealthy.

2. We should not judge
motives or outward appearances (John 7:24; 1 Cor. 13:7). Rather, we should try
to give the most positive interpretation of a person’s action, unless there is
clear-cut evidence of sin.

3. We should not judge the
ser­vice of another Christian (1 Cor. 4:1-4), for example, thinking that my
service for the Lord is more profitable than my brother’s service.



4. We should not judge those who
feel free before the Lord to do something we don’t feel right about, nor should
the others judge us, provided it is a matter about which Scripture is silent
(for example, eating fish on Friday) (Rom. 14:1-5; Col. 2:16).

5. We should not engage in
any of the reproving and correcting activities of Matt. 18:15-17, Gal. 6:1,
etc., unless we are in a state of self-judg­ment before the Lord.

Meditation




by Andrew Miller

There is nothing that the men of
this world dread more than solitude and reflection. They would rather be
overpressed with engagements than have leisure for thought. The conscience, ill
at ease, will at such times lift up its voice; but its warning voice must be
hushed by the convenient word "duty" and its honest speech is soon
and willingly forgotten. Sins—many sins—are there, and the thought of God as
the judge of sin is dreadful. The condition of the soul is such that it cannot
bear the light; therefore darkness is loved (John 3:19). The activities of this
present life are sought and welcomed, that the crushing weight of reflection
may be escaped. The pleasures of the world, too, in due time and place, serve a
similar purpose.

Thus every care is taken that
solitude may be avoided, and that there may be no opportunity for calm and
serious reflection. The solemn and eternal realities of the soul have no
portion of thought or time allowed them, the higher, nobler, and better part of
man is totally neglected and left uncared for and unprovided for,
notwithstanding its deep, pressing, and eternal need. "For what shall it
profit a man if he shall gain the whole world and lose his own soul? or what
shall a man give in exchange for his soul?" (Mark 8:36,37). Such alas! is
man—man without the knowledge of God, without the knowledge of his condition as
a sinner, and without the knowledge of Jesus as the Saviour of sinners.

But turn for a while, O my soul,
from the contemplation of a scene so heart-rending; though strong, yet tender,
are the links that would draw thee there, and lead thee to wean loved ones from
it and win them for Christ. Cherish a spirit of meditation in the sweet solitudes
of the soul’s separation from the world, where the scene is radiant and joyous
with the presence of the Saviour. The wider the separation from the world, the
deeper the communion and the richer the blessing. When heart and spirit have no
sympathy with the world, then really, though in the world, they are yet
far away from its bustle and all its unhallowed scenes. A mighty chasm now
separates believers from this present evil world:"They are not of the
world," says Christ, "even as I am not of the world" (John
17:16). The position of Christ in resurrection is the definition of our
position as seen in Him. The calm, reflective quiet of the soul in communion
with the Person of the exalted Lord is what characterizes its sweetest moments
while here on earth. These may be found in the sick room, in the quiet country
home, or in the very seat and center of this world’s activities.  All
depends on the state of the heart. To be alone and yet not alone, how blessed!

"My meditation of Him shall
be sweet" (Psa. 104:34).

(From Meditations on the Song
of Solomon
.)

Perfect Law of Liberty (James 1:23-25)




(James 1:23-25)

(James 1:23-25)                              

"If any be a hearer of the
Word and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a
glass." He may have ever so clear a view of himself; he sees clearly what
he is like for a moment; but he as soon forgets all. "He beholds himself
and goes his way." The image is faded and gone. He "straightway forgets
what manner of man he was." Oh, how true this is! It is that glimpse of
conviction by the truth that comes before souls when they are forced to discern
what the spring of their thoughts is, what their feelings are when the light of
God flashes over and through a man; but how soon it passes away, instead of
entering in and abiding within the soul! It is the power of the Spirit of God
alone that can engrave these things on the heart. Here the apostle is exposing
the absence of an internal work where intelligence is severed from conscience.
On the other hand, there is power and permanence with him who fixes his view on
"the perfect law of liberty."

What is "the law of
liberty"? It is the Word of God which directs a man begotten by the Word
of truth, urging and cheering and strengthening him in the very things that the
new life delights in. Consequently it has an action exactly the opposite of
that exercised by the law of Moses on the Israelites. This is evident from the
bare terms:"You shall not" do this, "You shall not"
do that. Why? Because they wanted to do what God prohibited. The natural desire
of man is after evil, but the law put a veto on the indulgence of the will. It
was necessarily negative, not positive, in character. The law forbade the very
things to which man’s own impulses and desires would have prompted him, and is
the solemn means of detecting rebellious fallen nature. But this is not the law
of liberty in any way, but the law of bondage, condemnation, and death.

 

The law of liberty brings in the
positive for those who love it—not the negation of what the will and lust of
man desires so much as the exercise of the new life—in what is according to its
own nature. Thus it has been often and very aptly described as a loving parent
who tells his child that he must go here or there; that is, the very places
which he knows perfectly the child would be most gratified to visit. Such is
the law of liberty. It is as if one said to the child, "Now, my child, you
must go and do such and such a thing," all the while knowing that you can
confer no greater favor on the child. It has not at all the character of
resisting the will of the child, but rather the directing of his affections in
the will of the object dearest to him. The child is regarded and led according
to the love of the parent who knows what the desire of the child is—a desire
that has been in virtue of a new nature implanted by God Himself in the child.
He has given Him a life that loves His ways and Word, that hates and revolts
from evil, and is pained most of all by falling through unwatchfulness under
sin, if it seemed ever so little. The law of liberty therefore consists not so
much in a restraint on gratifying the old man as in guiding and guarding the
new; for the heart’s delight is in what is good and holy and true, and the word
of our God on the one hand exercises us in cleaving to that which is the joy of
the Christian’s heart, and strengthens us in our detestation of all that we
know to be offensive to the Lord.

Such is the law of liberty.
Accordingly, "Whoso looks into the perfect law of liberty, and continues
therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man
shall be blessed in his deed [or rather, doing]."

(From Help and Food, Vol.
25.)

Women of the Bible:12. Abigail and Sapphira




"And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be<br /> alone; I will make him a help meet for him" (Gen

"And the LORD God said, It is
not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a help meet for
him" (Gen. 2:18).

Abigail was truly a helper to her
"churlish" (or selfish and stingy) husband, Nabal. Even though her
husband was not a good man, she interceded with David on his behalf and spared
Nabal and his sons and servants from being slaughtered. At the same time she
spared David from the shame and guilt of shedding innocent blood (1 Sam.
25:23-31). The outcome for Abigail was that she received a blessing from David
(verses 32-35) and later, after Nabal died, she became David’s wife (verses
40-42).

Sapphira, on the other hand,
failed to be a helper to her lying, hypocritical husband, Ananias. The early
Christians unselfishly sold their property and shared the proceeds with the
poor and persecuted believers (Acts 4:32-37). Ananias was one of those who
"sold a possession" and "brought a certain part and laid it at
the apostles’ feet" (Acts 5:1,2). There was nothing wrong with this in and
of itself, but Ananias pretended that he was giving the entire
proceeds from the sale to help the poor. This was hypocrisy and it was sin
(verses 2-4).

This sinful act, which brought
God’s judgment of death upon Ananias (verse 5), was bad enough. But to make
matters worse, his wife Sapphira was a party to the entire matter (verses 2,8).
As Ananias’ helper, she had a wonderful opportunity to appeal to her husband to
tell the truth. Instead, she repeated his lie—and died with him (verse 10).

"He who converts the sinner
from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a
multitude of sins" (Jas. 5:20).

The Church in a Day of Ruin (Part 10)



                    Some Final Exhortations

                        and Challenges

In this series of articles, the
author has attempted to show from Scripture how we can come close to patterning
the meetings and activities of assemblies of believers after those of the early
Church in the New Testament. Due to the tragic divisions that have torn the
Church apart over the past 2,000 years, and particularly since the Protestant
Reformation, it is not possible to live out the New Testament Church in every
detail. But it should be the desire of every blood-bought child of God to come
as close as possible to carrying out Christ’s plan for His Church.

Many readers of Words of Truth,
along with the author, are part of a fellowship in which (1) there is a circle
of assemblies (see March 1998 issue); (2) there is weekly observance of the
Lord’s Supper (see May 1998); (3) all the brothers are allowed and
encouraged to participate in every meeting of the local church for worship and
ministry (see September and November 1998); (4) church discipline is carried
out (see January 1999); and (5) there is closed communion (see March 1999).
There may be a tendency among such believers to have a feeling of smugness that
we—unlike most other believers—are following the order found in Holy
Scripture concerning the Church in this day of ruin. This final article of the
series is intended to remove any smugness and to challenge our hearts and
consciences as to how well we are carrying out in practice the
scriptural principles concerning the Church

The unity of assemblies. If
we really believe in the importance of showing forth the unity of the body of
Christ, then each of us needs earnestly and prayerfully to seek peace and unity
in all matters by showing love, giving up pride, self‑assertion, self‑ambition—though
not giving up fundamental truth—for the sake of the unity of the whole. If I
disagree with the rest of the assembly on a matter, I must not try to force my
opinion (which might make me a heretic), but seek prayerful, non‑threatening
discussions of the scriptural principles involved in the matter. The apostle
Paul summarizes this point so well:"I … beseech you that you walk
worthy of the vocation wherewith you are called, with all lowliness and
meekness, with longsuffering, forbearing one another in love, endeavoring to
keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace" (Eph. 4:1-3).



In the case where two or more
assemblies in a circle of fellowship are within driving distance of each other,
care must be taken not to fall into a "go to the church of your choice"
mentality. Suppose a family lives 15 miles north of Assembly A and 25 miles
south of Assembly B, both in the same circle of fellowship. With which of the
two assemblies should they be identified? Does it matter? Is it suitable to
alternate between the two? There does not seem to be a clear scriptural answer
to these questions. However, there is a certain accountability involved in
being in fellowship (as implied by there being those who take the oversight in
each assembly and by the need sometimes for assembly discipline). Therefore,
alternating between two assemblies does not fit in with this accountability.
Either Assembly A or B should clearly be the "home" assembly, with
the great majority of one’s time spent meeting and working with that assembly.
On the other hand, visits to neighboring assemblies or to those far away
certainly are not precluded as shown many times in the New Testament (Acts
19:24-28; Rom. 16:1,2; 2 Cor. 3:1).

In the judgment of the author, it
would seem to be orderly in general for one to be identified with the
assembly that is closest geographically. A very practical reason for this is
that it enhances one’s ability to be present at the assembly meetings and to
serve the Lord together with others in that local assembly. There are special
considerations that might lead one to make the geographically more distant
assembly as his/her "home" assembly. For example, one who lives
closer to Assembly A might have a particular spiritual gift that is lacking in
Assembly B. On the other hand, if one is having difficulty getting along with
his/her brothers and sisters in Assembly A and switches affiliation to Assembly
B to escape the problems, this is not a manifestation of keeping "the
unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace." In this author’s judgment, any
decision to affiliate with the geographically more distant assembly should be
done with the complete knowledge, approval, and fellowship of both Assembly A
and B. Anything else would seem to be a practical denial of the unity of
assemblies.

The heavenly character of the
Church
. As brought out in the May 1998 installment of this series, the
Church as the bride of Christ has a heavenly Head and a heavenly
hope and its members are heavenly citizens with heavenly
blessings. What a challenge is this for each member of the Church! Our
heavenly-mindedness (Phil. 3:20; Col. 3:1-4), non-conformance to the world
(Rom. 12:2), and living in the constant expectation of the Lord’s return (1
Thess. 1:10;4:13-18) should far exceed that of other groups that do not
understand the heavenly character of the Church.

Gathering often to break bread.
Do we look forward to these occasions, or has it become just a ritual, or even
a bother? Do we go there expecting to meet the Lord, preparing by asking
ourselves, "What if I were in heaven and called upon to say something to
the Lord; what would I say?" Do we prepare our hearts for these meetings
by meditating on appropriate scriptures and hymns? Do you sisters prepare? Do
you participate—albeit silently—by praying and meditating?



The priesthood of all believers.
Some assemblies that hold to the truth of the priesthood of all believers in
principle
have lapsed into almost a one‑man priesthood by
non-participation on the part of most. We live in a spectator society and sadly
this has largely carried over into the assembly.

Are you, my reader, a "silent
priest"? Does week after week pass by without your uttering a word of
praise or thanks in the meeting for remembering the Lord, or without your
praying in—or perhaps without even attending—the assembly prayer meeting? If
so, I suggest that you re-read the section on "Silent Priests" in the
September 1998 issue. Keep in mind that it does not do much good to follow the principle
of the priesthood of all believers if you do not act upon it yourself.

The responsibility of all
believers for ministry and service in the assembly
. Each of us needs to ask
on our knees before the Lord:"What do I do in the body and for the Lord?
What is my personal role and responsibility in the local assembly? Once again,
while we may accept in principle that the system of clergy/laity is
unscriptural, do we unwittingly push others in the direction of clergy by our
own inactivity and lack of participation in the assembly? Do we place the full‑time
servants of the Lord who travel among the assemblies on a higher plane than the
full‑time servants of the Lord with secular employment (which comprise
all the rest of the saints)? Do we expect a visiting "traveling
brother" to act in all of the capacities of pastor, teacher, evangelist,
Sunday School teacher, and worship leader, whatever his particular gift might
be? Do we hold back in the remembrance meeting, waiting for the visiting
servant of the Lord to give thanks for the loaf and cup? If we are having a
problem in our assembly or facing a difficult decision, do we automatically
call one or more of the traveling brothers to come and help us, or do we ask
the godly brothers of a nearby assembly to assist? At fellowship‑wide
conferences, do we relax and enjoy ourselves, expecting that the full‑time
servants will take care of all of the preaching and teaching responsibilities?

Do we excel in our concern for the
unsaved? in evangelistic outreach? in active discipling and training of those
newly saved? in visitation of the sick, bereaved, aged, shut-in, and
imprisoned? in seeking to restore those "overtaken in a fault" (Gal.
6:1)? Or do we only excel in our holding of New Testament principles
concerning the Church?



The existence and role of
overseers and guides
. It is commonly taught in many assemblies that we
cannot appoint overseers/bishops/elders today since it was only apostles and
apostolic delegates who had that authority. Assuming the validity of this
teaching, there is yet a crucial need to face up to the fact that it is clearly
God’s desire that there should be such overseers in each local assembly. Why
else would the qualifications of an overseer be given to us in the Bible (1
Tim. 3, Tit. 1)? Two things are needed in this regard:First, each brother in
each local assembly ought to examine himself whether he meets the
qualifications of an overseer. If so, he should be very much before the Lord as
to carrying out the role and responsibilities of an overseer (as described in
the January 1999 issue). Further, when qualified brothers do take that
place in the assembly, the rest of the assembly should be willing to receive
any rebuke, reproof, correction, instruction, or warning lovingly and
faithfully given to them by the overseer. Individuals in the assembly could go
even further and encourage the overseer to feel free to come to them whenever
he sensed a slackening of interest or a departure into the world, etc. What a
wonderful way of giving practical encouragement to those brothers who lovingly,
faithfully, and self‑sacrificially do this good and often thankless work.

Carrying out church discipline.
Do we advise those about to be received into fellowship not only of the privileges
of being in fellowship (particularly, breaking bread), but also of the responsibilities,
and that they are now subject to reproof, instruction, and warning by those who
have the oversight (or others in the assembly), and to assembly discipline if
warranted? When receiving children and teens into fellowship, do we find out
how they behave at home—such as whether their parents are having severe
discipline problems with them? And do we notice how they behave at the assembly
meetings—whether they enter into the singing, are attentive to the preaching
and teaching, regularly attend all the meetings, or whether they are frequently
whispering to their neighbor and showing a general disinterest? Do we parents
push our children into asking to be received into fellowship as part of an ego
trip for ourselves? Do we consider assembly discipline for active, continual
patterns of sin other than fornication or adultery? Do we follow the different
scriptural steps of discipline, or just ignore the problem until it calls for
the final, extreme act of excommunication? Do we regularly encourage in one
another greater self‑discipline and striving for holiness?

Let us not become complacent about
following the principles of Scripture concerning the Church. Let us rather seek
to be more faithful in carrying out these principles in our local assemblies.
Furthermore, let us seek to excel in faithfulness to the Lord and to the
Scriptures in every area of Christian living.

The Church in a Day of Ruin (Part 9)



                Can We Carry Out the Practices

                     of the New Testament

                         Church Today?

In the previous parts of this
series we have studied a number of practices of the Church in New Testament
times.

1. There was a total unity of
local churches or assemblies throughout the Christian world.

2. There was no clergy-laity
system or one-man ministry in the local church. The Holy Spirit was the
intended leader of the assembly meetings. Under His direction all of the
brothers in the assembly were free to participate in worship, prayer, and
ministry of the Word. A small number of Christian fellowships today seek to
allow the Holy Spirit, rather than an appointed pastor, to be the leader in
their assembly meetings.

3. The Lord’s supper was
celebrated daily at first and then on the first day of every week. Weekly
remembrance of the Lord in the breaking of bread is observed by some Christian
fellowships today.

4. Apostles or their delegates
appointed overseers or elders to watch for the souls of the saints in each
local assembly. While there is no clear scriptural basis for appointing such
church officials today (in the absence of apostles and their delegates),
clearly there is room for those who meet the qualifications (1 Timothy 3) to
serve the Lord in this capacity in the local church.

5. Assembly discipline was carried
out, warning, rebuking, or even excommunicating persistent evil-doers, and
restoring to fellowship those who repented of their evil deeds. Today, a few
local assemblies still try to administer church discipline. However, all too
many today turn the other way and excuse sinful behavior by saying, "All
of us are sinners," or "We are not to judge others, or "God is a
forgiving God."

                The Fragmentation of the Church

The practice of the New Testament
Church that is by far the most difficult to carry out today is having a unity
of assemblies. In the first century, the Church was not only in principle but
also in practice one body. No divisions had come in. No separate
denominations had been created. However, such divisions were anticipated by the
apostle Paul through inspiration by the Holy Spirit when he instructed Timothy
as to the possible need of separating or purging oneself from a mixture of the
true believers ("vessels of gold and silver") and the faithless, nominal,
superficial, professing Christians ("vessels … of wood and of
earth"), and joining with those who "call on the Lord out of a pure
heart" (2 Tim. 2:20-22).



The Church today, in its outward
aspect, has been smashed to smithereens! How we should weep and mourn over the
divided state of the Church today! How we should long for a measure of recovery
of that unity that originally existed among all of the local assemblies of the
body of Christ! And how, even more, we should long for the blessed, eternal day
in which there will be full recovery of the one body to its pristine,
undivided state!

I have heard or read it expressed
a number of times:"God has arranged the Church into many different
denominations so that each believer may select the one with the kind of pastor,
manner of worship, scheme of church government, or variety of activities that
best suit his/her needs or personality." NOT SO! By no means is God
responsible for the many denominations and divisions of the Church! Sinful man
is responsible for them! In my estimation, based on Church history, the
following are the most common reasons for divisions in the Church:

1. Doctrinal error. The
best example of this is the Protestant Reformation of the 16th century. A large
number of believers left the Roman Catholic Church primarily in order to
reclaim the biblical doctrine of salvation by faith alone rather than by works
or faith plus works.

2. Sinful practices. One of
the secondary issues in the Protestant Reformation was the sale of indulgences
(deliverance from suffering in purgatory for particular sins) by the priests to
the people. Closer to the present time, there have been divisions in Protestant
churches over offering membership and even pastorates to practicing homosexuals
or unrepentant adulterers.

3. Human ego. Men (and,
with growing frequency, women) with the spirit of Diotrephes "who love to
have the preeminence" (3 John 9) sometimes break away from a church to
start their own congregation.

4. Differences of views.
Churches and denominations have divided over differences in understanding of
various scriptural doctrines, such as infant versus believer’s baptism,
premillennial versus postmillennial coming of Christ, and episcopal (bishops)
versus presbyterian (elders) versus congregational forms of church government.

5. Dissention over church
discipline
. All too often, when church discipline is carried out against an
unrepentant sinner, there are some who think the discipline is too harsh,
others who think it is too lenient, some who think the person has repented,
others who disagree, some who continue fellowshiping with the sinner, others
who do not, and so forth. Satan loves such situations and has managed to cause
assemblies and entire fellowships or denominations to divide over such disagreements.



It is rather ironic that the
stronger the emphasis on the authority and divine inspiration of the Scriptures
and the supremacy of the Word of God, and on being filled with the knowledge of
God’s Word, the greater the likelihood of division. The reason for this is
straightforward:two or more gifted teachers, both believing in the supremacy
of the Scriptures, and both having invested many years in intense Bible study,
become absolutely convinced that their understanding of Scripture is correct.
If two teachers or groups of teachers arrive at quite different interpretations
of a particular passage or doctrine, both may firmly believe that they are
absolutely correct in their understanding. With certain issues, for example,
household versus believer’s baptism, the adherents of each view may be able to
practice what they believe to be scriptural without separating from one
another. With other issues, such as appointing elders or not, there may not be
a way for both parties to be satisfied at the same time. Sadly, the solution
often is division.

Are such divisions ordained by God
to make it possible for everybody to be "happy"? Again I say,
vehemently, ABSOLUTELY NOT! But how can they be avoided? By tempering
knowledge with a large dose of patience, self-control, and humility.
"Fulfill my joy, that you be like-minded, having the same love, being of
one accord, of one mind. Let nothing be done through strife or vainglory; but
in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves" (Phil.
2:2,3). "With all lowliness and meekness, and with long-suffering,
forbearing one another in love, endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in
the bond of peace" (Eph. 4:2,3). "Giving all diligence, add to your
faith virtue; and to virtue, knowledge; and to knowledge, temperance [or
self-control]" (2 Pet. 1:5,6).

Those who excel in knowledge and
understanding of the Scriptures, and who sincerely want to be absolutely true
to the Scriptures in their teaching and practice, often exhibit an
"Achilles’ heel," a particular area of weakness and failure:they
fail to accept that there may be other Christians—particularly those who
disagree with them—who have an equal (or even greater) knowledge
of the Scriptures, and are equally devoted to the Lord and equally sincere in
wanting to be true to the Word of God in doctrine and practice. There is
failure to "esteem other better than themselves." There is lack of
humility. There is pride and ego.

These failures and weaknesses on
the parts of gifted, knowledgeable teachers of the Word of God must be
recognized and acknowledged. Only then will it be possible for the disagreeing
parties to meet together on their knees, praying together, crying out to the
Lord to help them to resolve their differences and depending totally upon the
Holy Spirit to bring it about; and to discuss together humbly their differences
in understanding, each acknowledging the fact that one or both of the parties
is wrong and the possibility (as remote as it might seem at the moment) that
they themselves might be the ones who are wrong. If this were done with every
disagreement among Christians, would there need to be any divisions
among them?

                    What Are We to Do Now?



Given the present fragmented state
of the Church, is there any way, in faithfulness to God’s Word, to manifest the
truth that "there is one body" (Eph. 4:4)? A number of different ways
in which this is being attempted today are now presented.

The Open-Communion Model.
In most denominations of Protestantism liberty is given to members of other
denominations to "take communion." With some it matters not whether a
person is a true, born‑again child of God. With others the admonition is
given to partake only if one is truly saved. And with some the exhortation is
given for each potential participant to examine him/herself and judge before
God any unconfessed sin before partaking. For the most part, the unity thus
existing among members of different denominations is a unity limited to
partaking of communion, and generally not extended to the privilege of
preaching, teaching, leading the worship, or participating in any decision
making as a non‑member of that church or denomination. It can be a
confusing as well as unholy kind of unity since two branches of a particular
denomination (e.g., regular vs. reformed Presbyterians) may recently have
separated from one another over fundamental differences of doctrine or practice
(e.g., denial of the virgin birth of Christ or ordination of homosexuals), but
yet the members of each are free to take communion with the other whenever they
wish. Furthermore, there is relatively little church discipline carried out in
many of the churches, so that adulterers, drunkards, drug‑users, railers,
blasphemers, income tax cheaters, etc. who ought to be brought under church
discipline are allowed, under the dictates of their individual consciences, to
take communion along with those believers who are walking faithfully with the
Lord.

The Independent Assembly Model.
This is quite similar to the previous model, except that the assemblies in this
model exercise more care in reception to fellowship and often carry out church
discipline. Under this model, each separate assembly, even within a larger
fellowship, is considered to be an autonomous unit, independent of all other
assemblies. If a sister is received at Assembly A, she may be refused at
Assembly B. Or if a brother is put away from Assembly A because of some kind of
wickedness, he may be received by Assembly B. And then things really get
confusing when the saints of both assemblies get together at an annual
conference and all break bread together. By receiving all individuals who give
genuine evidence of being saved, are living moral, upright lives, and not
holding fundamentally wrong doctrine (such as denying the deity of Christ),
whether they are members of various denominational churches, other assemblies
in the same fellowship, or whatever, these assemblies are attempting to show
forth the truth that there is one body. However, they do this at the expense of
having fellowship at times with those who are themselves associated with
unbelievers or with believers who are not upright in walk or sound in doctrine.
At stake here is the question of whether the mere association with evil should
produce a bar to fellowship.



The Occasional Fellowship Model.
Under this model, there is a circle of interdependent assemblies, all in
fellowship with one another, rather than many mutually independent
assemblies. A person received at or put away from Assembly A is automatically
received at or put away from Assembly B. At the same time, a believer who is a
member, say of a Baptist or Presbyterian congregation, would generally not be
permitted to break bread with the assembly if he/she is doing the same at other
times at a church in another denomination or fellowship. However, in order to
give at least lip service to the truth that there is one body, and the
admission of all true believers in the Church at large, "occasional fellowship"
may be practiced. By this, one who may be visiting from out of town for a week
or two, who is known to be saved, walking uprightly, and holding right doctrine
about fundamental questions, will be allowed to partake of the Lord’s Supper
during the visit. In some assemblies this is broadened to include college
students while they are away from home, but who return to fellowship at their
denominational church when they return home for holidays and the summer months.
It is not clear whether this measure of unity extends to allowing the visitors
to preach, teach, participate in the worship services, etc. The same problems
discussed in the previous section of being linked with evil applies to this
model.

The Closed Communion (or
Guarded Table) Model
. With this model the expression of the unity of the
body is provided by, but also limited to, having a circle of assemblies, all in
mutual fellowship with each other. We are enjoined in 2 Cor. 6:14‑18 not
to be "unequally yoked together with unbelievers" or "with unrighteousness"
and to separate from any such associations. Further, 2 Tim. 2:20,21 teaches
separation from a mixture of the pure and impure, that is, from believers who
may be morally and doctrinally upright, but linked with either unbelievers or believers
who are going on in unjudged moral or doctrinal evil. This is supported by 1
Cor. 5:6,7 and Gal. 5:9, "A little leaven leavens the whole lump." It
is also supported by the Old Testament pictures of leprosy spreading from one
person to another unless the leper is put away from the camp (Lev. 13,14), and
of one who touches a dead body being unclean for seven days (Num. 19:11). This
would seem to preclude the practice of "occasional fellowship." Also,
in contrast with the independent assemblies model, scriptures given previously
(Mar-April 1998 issue) concerning letters of commendation would indicate
biblical support for interdependent rather than independent
assemblies.

With this model there is a
somewhat more narrow unity and in certain ways a lesser expression of the
oneness of the body of Christ than with the previous models. However, this is
offset by (1) a more faithful concern for the holiness of Christ, and (2) by a
fuller, deeper unity. Let us expand upon these two points.



As to the first point, if assembly
discipline is not carried out when called for (1 Cor. 5:13), then each one in
the local assembly is linked with the wickedness and Christ, the Head of the
body, is also joined with the wickedness. If a person from that assembly visits
another assembly and participates in the Lord’s Supper there, then he/she
carries that link with wickedness, and unites everyone in the other assembly
with it as well. Those in the other assembly may not immediately be aware of
the link with wickedness, and may never become actively involved in that
wickedness, but as they have fellowship with Christ at the Lord’s table,
Christ’s name is linked with the wickedness and He certainly is sensitive to
that link.

As to the second point concerning
a fuller, deeper unity, with open communion or occasional fellowship there may
be effected a more or less broad unity among the members of the body of Christ.
However, that unity may often not extend beyond the sharing of the loaf and the
cup. But in the present "guarded table" model, any who may visit from
another assembly within the circle are accorded the privilege not only of
participating in the Lord’s Supper, but also of preaching, teaching, praying,
administering the loaf and cup in the remembrance meeting, and other privileges
of those who are in regular fellowship in that local assembly. In other words,
the unity that is expressed is more all‑encompassing in character.

Instead of giving a visitor the
opportunity of a temporary, superficial unity by participating in the Lord’s
Supper, it would seem better to work with that individual along the lines of
achieving a permanent, fuller, deeper unity. Thus an appeal might be made to
the brother, on the basis of 2 Tim. 2:20,21 and 2 Cor. 6:14‑20, to purge
himself from that mixture of believers and unbelievers, righteous and
unrighteous; or else to go back to his home assembly and see if there would be
a willingness to study and discuss the scriptural principles concerning the
Church. If his/her local assembly were to begin adhering to the biblical
principles concerning the Church as described in earlier parts of this series,
and if any erroneous doctrines or wicked practices that may have been a cause
of division were repented of and resolved, there might eventually develop a
basis for full communion between the two groups. This would mean that not only
would the visitor from Assembly A now be free to break bread (as well as preach
or teach, if so gifted) with Assembly B, but also individuals from Assembly B
would be free to visit and enjoy full communion with Assembly A as well.

Women of the Bible:14. Priscilla (and Aquila)




Have you ever wondered what is the attraction of reunions of military<br /> units

Have you ever wondered what is the
attraction of reunions of military units? Why would people want to be reminded
of some of the most uncomfortable if not painful and even terrifying times in
their lives? I used to wonder about that but as I have gotten older I have come
to appreciate in a limited way (I have never been in the military) the strength
of the bonds that are forged when people work for a common goal, battle a
common enemy, depend upon each other for their survival, and suffer together.

Priscilla and Aquila are never
mentioned separately, but always together. Their marriage is an example of how
working, serving, and suffering together can strengthen the bonds between
husband and wife.

Priscilla and Aquila worked
together at their secular occupation (tentmaking, Acts 18:3). (For the purposes
of this article, secular occupation will mean the work by which one provides
for the physical needs of oneself or others.) I believe that in an ideal
environment all husbands and wives would do this. Unfortunately, in modern
society few couples can work together in the same secular work. However, even
if they are physically separated during their secular work, they can carry it
out with a common purpose; they can have a partnership of attitude. For
example, let us suppose the husband of a young couple with children goes out to
some job or business, while the wife stays home to care for the children and
house. The husband should not regard his job as a means to inflate his ego or
to make a name for himself in the business or professional world. The purpose
of his job is to glorify God, provide a means to lay up treasure in heaven, and
to provide for the physical and material needs of his family. Likewise, the
wife in spending the money her husband earns and in caring for the home should
not have as her goals keeping herself and the children in the forefront of
fashion or making her home the showplace of the neighborhood, but to glorify
God, have the means to lay up treasure in heaven, and provide for the various needs
of the family.

If the wife works outside the
home, her purposes should be the same ones; her work should not be a means to
pursue selfish ends. There should be this oneness of attitude toward the
purposes of secular work even if the couple cannot engage in exactly the same
work.

The husband and wife should also
minister together to the emotional, educational, and spiritual needs of the
family. Both should be interested in the training and discipline of the
children. Both should share the interests and activities of the children. Both
should provide time in their schedules for family worship, family
communication, and family recreation.



Aquila and Priscilla not only
worked together in their secular work; they also worked together in their spiritual
ministry. Together they traveled with the apostle Paul to Syria (Acts 18:18),
together they ministered to Apollos (Acts 18:26), and together they provided a
place in their home for the assembly (1 Cor. 16:19). Both are referred to as
Paul’s helpers in Christ Jesus (Rom. 16:3). The ideal Christian couple should
be seeking ways to serve the Lord together and to help one another develop and
use the spiritual gifts of each. A husband and wife can minister together in
teaching children, in visits to homes and hospitals, in tract distribution, and
in ministering to the saved and unsaved in their own home. If the husband has
been given a gift for public ministry, the wife can have a part in this as they
study the Bible and pray together. The wife’s spiritual and scriptural insights
spoken to her husband privately may be very helpful to him as he ministers
publicly. Even if their roles in the ministry are somewhat different, they
should have the partnership of a common purpose.

Serving the Lord together promotes
the unity of the couple as well as the interests of Christ. In fact, the unity
of the couple is one of Christ’s interests (Eph. 5:28-31). Working
together to promote spiritual, emotional, and physical well-being in each
other, in their own children, and in persons outside the family will form
special ties between husband and wife that can be formed in no other way.

What about suffering together?
When Paul met Priscilla and Aquila in Corinth, they were essentially refugees,
having been expelled from Rome along with other Jews by the Emperor Claudius
(Acts 18:1,2). They had suffered the loss of their home. Evidently they
eventually returned to Rome because Paul sent greetings to them and the
assembly meeting in their house when he wrote to the Roman believers (Rom.
16:3-5). Paul says of Priscilla and Aquila, "[They] have for my life laid
down their own necks [or risked their lives]" (Rom. 16:4). This may have
been during turmoil in Corinth (Acts 18:6,12-16) or turmoil in Ephesus where
Priscilla and Aquila lived after leaving Corinth (Acts 18:19; 19:23-41).
Obviously, being close friends of the apostle Paul could be dangerous. We know
of all too many incidents where trouble and suffering such as unemployment, the
death of a child, or the serious illness of one spouse has driven married
couples apart. But this should not be. It is a privilege to suffer with and for
Christ and it is a privilege to suffer with and for other Christians, including
our spouse. Love develops and deepens as we go through trials together. The
veterans who still gather to share their memories and comradeship years after
the battles in which they fought know this, and it is a principle suggested by
Scripture as well (Rom. 12:15; 1 Cor. 12:26; Heb. 13:3).

Like Priscilla and Aquila, let us
respond to Christ in such a way that all of life’s experiences, pleasant and
painful, draw us closer together in our marriages as well as in the assembly.

Worship (John 12:1-11)




She came not to hear a sermon, although the greatest of teachers was<br /> there

She came not to hear a sermon,
although the greatest of teachers was there.

To sit at His feet and hear His
words (Luke 10:39) was not her purpose now, blessed as that was in its proper
place.

She came not to make her requests
known to Him (John 11:3).

There was a time when, in deepest
submission to His will, she had fallen at His feet, saying, "Lord, if Thou
hadst been here, my broth­er had not died" (John 11:32); but to pour out
her supplications to Him as her only resource was not now her thought, for her
brother was seated at the table.

She came not to meet the saints,
though precious saints were there (Matt. 26:8). Fellowship with them was
blessed likewise, and doubtless of frequent occurrence; but fellowship was not
her object now.

She came not after the weariness
and toil of a week’s battling with the world to be refreshed from Him, though,
surely, she like every saint had learned the trials of the wilderness; and none
more than she, probably, knew the blessed springs of refreshment that were in
Him.

But she came—when the world was
about to express its deepest hatred of Him (John 12:1)—to pour out what she
long had treasured up (verse 7), and of much value (verse 5), upon the person
of Him whose love had made her heart captive, and absorbed her affections.

It was not Simon the leper, not
the disciples, not her brother and sister in the flesh, but her Lord who
engaged her attention now. Jesus filled her soul—her heart and her eye
were on Him, and her hands and feet were subservient to her eye and to
her heart as she "anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped His feet with her
hair."

Adoration, homage, worship,
blessing was her one thought; and that in honor of the One who was "all in
all" to her. How refreshing was such worship to Him!

The ungodly (verse 4) and the
unspiritual (Matt. 26:6-9) might murmur, but He upheld her cause, and showed
how He could appreciate and value the grateful tribute of a heart that knew His
worth and preciousness and could not be silent about it. A lasting record is
preserved of what worship really is by the One who accepted it and of the one
who rendered it.

Be it ours now, dear reader, from
hearts filled with the Holy Spirit, to break upon Him our spiritual box of
ointment in worship, praise, and thanksgiving.

(From Help and Food, Vol.
15.)

Beloved Disciples




by Roger W

Jerome (331-420 A.D.), the early
"church father" famed for his Latin "Vulgate" translation of
the Bible, has left an account of the aged apostle, John. The story was
presumably passed down by one of John’s disciples, Polycarp or Ignatius. John,
well past his 90th year, was "carried into a church and, unable to speak
at any length, would say, ‘Little children, love one another.’"

John was probably the youngest of
the Lord’s disciples. We think of him (and rightly so) as gentle and loving,
resembling his Master. But it was not always so. He and his brother James were
fishermen, the sons of Zebedee. But the Lord Jesus "surnamed them
Boanerges, which is, the sons of thunder" (Mark 3:17).

Without mentioning his own name,
John often described himself as the "disciple whom Jesus loved" (John
13:23; 20:2; 21:7,20) and as the one who leaned on Jesus’ bosom at the last
supper (John 13:23). He identified Himself only at the end of the Gospel
bearing his name (John 21:24).

This disciple whom we think of as
kind and forbearing wanted, along with his brother James, to "command fire
to come down from heaven and consume" a village of inhospitable
Samaritans. For this rashness, the Lord Jesus had to rebuke them (Luke
9:51-56).

John displayed his intolerance by
forbidding a man who was casting out demons in Jesus’ name. Again, the Lord had
to reprove and correct him (Luke 9:49,50). Misplaced pride and ambition caused
John and James to make a vain request of the Lord:"And James and John, the
sons of Zebedee, come unto Him, saying, Master, we would that Thou shouldest do
for us whatsoever we shall desire. And He said unto them, What would you that I
should do for you? They said unto Him, Grant unto us that we may sit, one on
Thy right hand, and the other on Thy left hand, in Thy glory" (Mark
10:35-37).

This presumption on their part
displeased the other ten disciples and they were moved with indignation against
them. The Lord told them, "To sit on My right hand, and on My left, is not
mine to give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of My
Father." He added, "Whosoever will be great among you, let him be
your minister; and whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant:
even as the Son of Man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to
give His life a ransom for many" (Matt. 20:23-28).

It was John’s nearness to the Lord
Jesus that eventually effected the change in John’s behavior and manner of
life. In an earlier age, King David wrote a psalm "in the day that the
Lord had delivered him out of the hand of all his enemies, and out of the hand
of Saul." In that psalm David praised the Lord:"Thou savest me from
violence." David recognized that not he but "The LORD thundered
from heaven … He delivered me, because He delighted in me… Thy
gentleness
has made me great" (2 Sam. 22:1,3,14,20,36; Psa. 18).

 

Another "Saul" came
violently out of Tarsus, making "havoc of the church … and … breathing
out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord" (Acts
8:3; 9:1). This fanatic dogmatist was also a young man. As he "beyond
measure … persecuted the church of God and wasted it" (Gal. 1:13), he
was confronted on the Damascus Road by the Lord Jesus. There Saul ("asked
for") became Paul ("little")—a new creation in Christ Jesus. He
who had been "a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee" (Acts 23:6) was
transformed, becoming not only a disciple, but an apostle of Christ, even one
who was "not a whit behind the very chiefest apostles" (2 Cor. 11:5;
12:11).

The lesson of his namesake was not
lost on him. King Saul put his own proud, rebellious will ahead of God’s clear
command. When his disobedience was discovered, the prophet Samuel said,
"When you were little in your own sight, were you not made the head
of the tribes of Israel, and the LORD anointed you king over Israel? … Has the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying
the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to
hearken than the fat of rams" (1 Sam. 15:17,22).

About 25 years after his
conversion, Paul recounted the experience to King Agrippa in which he "was
not disobedient unto the heavenly vision" (Acts 26:19). Paul’s
basis for exhorting the carnal Corinthians was not by his former
"threatenings," but rather beseeching "by the meekness and
gentleness of Christ" (2 Cor. 10:1).

Thus did John, a "son of
thunder," become that "disciple whom He loved" to whom
the Lord Jesus on the cross entrusted His mother (John 19:26,27). Thus did
Saul, the "persecutor" of the Lord Jesus, become "our beloved
brother
Paul (2 Pet. 3:15) and "such an one as Paul the aged … a
prisoner of Jesus Christ" (Philem. 9). To John was committed the writing
of the last book of the Bible:"The things that you have seen, and the
things that are, and the things that shall be hereafter" (Rev. 1:19). To
Paul’s trust was committed the "glorious Gospel of the blessed God,"
a "chosen vessel" to bear the name of Jesus Christ "before the
Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel" (1 Tim. 1:11; Acts 9:15).

The Lord Jesus invites all who
labor and are heavy laden to come unto Him. He can transform even the chief of
sinners into a servant, not striving, but "gentle unto all men, apt to
teach, patient, in meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God
peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth; and
that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken
captive by him for his will" (2 Tim. 2:24-26).

 

I know not the song of Thy praises,

Till Thou teach it, my God, to
me.

Till I hear the still voice of Thy Spirit,

 

Who speaketh for ever of Thee—

Till I hear the celestial singing,

And learn the new song of Thy
grace,

And then shall I tell forth the marvels

I learnt in Thy secret place.

Thy marvels, not mine, far surpassing

All thoughts of my heart must
they be—

I can but declare the glad tidings,

As Thou has declared them to
me.

                                          
Richard Rolle, 1349

 

Every believer on the Lord Jesus
Christ is "beloved of the Lord," just as the apostle Paul addressed
the Thessalonian saints:"But we ought to give thanks to God always for
you, brethren beloved of the Lord that God has chosen you to salvation
in sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth:whereto He has called
you by our glad tidings, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus
Christ. So then, brethren, stand firm, and hold fast the instructions which you
have been taught, whether by word or by our letter. But our Lord Jesus Christ Himself,
and our God and Father, who has loved us, and given us eternal
consolation and good hope by grace, encourage your hearts, and establish you in
every good work and word" (2 Thess. 2:13-17, JND).

"To the praise of the glory
of His grace, wherein He has made us accepted in the Beloved"
(Eph. 1:6).

Remember Your Guides




by Samuel Ridout

"Remember those who have the
rule over you [or your leaders or your guides], who have spoken unto you the
Word of God; whose faith follow, considering the end of their conversation [or
the outcome of their well-spent lives]" (Heb. 13:7).

In the Epistle to the Hebrews we
find a whole chapter devoted to human examples of faith. A great cloud of
witnesses looks down upon us in the eleventh chapter, and in the closing
chapter of the book, the writer speaks of their "guides" or
"leaders." They were to remember those who had passed away and
imitate their faith; they were to obey those who remained, realizing that they
were charged with weighty responsibilities, and were to salute them in all
honor and affection.

Scripture not only warrants but
commands the remembrance of those whom God has given as leaders of His people.
To forget them means, too often, to forget the truth they brought, and paves
the way for that "building the sepulchres of the prophets" by a
godless posterity who are indifferent to every warning spoken by those prophets
(Luke 11:47). There is a sober, discriminating way of dwelling upon the
ministry of faithful servants which encourages our own faith, quickens
conscience, and stirs afresh to follow them as they followed Christ.

Most biographies are written from
a human standpoint; the man is before us rather than his message. Such
biographies are not helpful; but who has not been stimulated by the narratives
of devotion, self-denial, unresting toil of faithful men at home or abroad? We
realize on either hand that they were men "of like passions with
ourselves" (Jas. 5:17), and that a Power wrought in and with them which is
for us too.

The passage we have quoted at the
beginning shows us how we can properly "remember our guides." First
of all, what makes their remembrance profitable is that they spoke to us the
Word of God. It was not for special personal excellence of character, either
natural or gracious; nor for great activities and results in the Lord’s work,
considered in themselves. What gives value to the remembrance of the leader is
the Word of God with which he was identified, the message he brought. 

We read of one of David’s mighty
men, Eleazar the son of Dodo, that he stood alone against a great host of
Philistines when "the men of Israel had gone away." He smote them
"till his hand was weary and his hand clave unto the sword; the LORD
wrought a great victory" (2 Sam. 23:9,10). His very name, "God is
help," turns from the man to God. What could he do single-handed against
the host of the enemy? His arm grew weary, but the weary hand cleaved to the
good sword, and we see no longer the feeble arm of man, but the power of God
behind that weary arm, hewing out victory with that sword. The man has become
identified with the sword, and God can use such a one.

 

So are all God’s mighty men;
feeble, and with weary arms, they cling to that "sword of the Spirit which
is the word of God" (Eph. 6:17). Their very weariness and feebleness makes
them cling like Jacob who, his thigh out of joint, could no more wrestle but
cling (Gen. 32:24-26). Such men God can use, for they are identified with their
sword, with the Word of God. To remember such is to remember the sword, the
Word which they brought. There can be no higher honor to a servant of Christ
than to identify him with the truth he ministered and to think of the sword he
held in his feebleness. The world may honor its soldiers, its men of wealth,
its benefactors, its entertainers, its athletes, and build them monuments. They
are its departed great men. Believers recall the memory of those who have left
their greatness in our hands, the Word of God. To do this is simply to have
mind refreshed and heart stirred by that which abides forever.

We are also to consider the issue,
or outcome of their walk. What has their life ended in? It has now ceased. A
rich man’s life ends, so far as what he leaves behind is concerned, in wealth;
a statesman’s in power and influence. In what shall we say the life of Christ’s
servant has ended? What has he left as the sum of that life? It is significant
that the very next clause gives what is really the answer:"Jesus Christ
the same yesterday, today, and forever" (Heb. 13:8). The issue of their
life is the abiding Christ. They have passed off the scene, but Christ, the
object of their ministry, abides. With Paul they could say, "To me to live
is Christ" (Phil. 1:21). Christ is the end, the goal of their life. To
depart and be with Him is far better. Happy indeed are those who are called to
lay down their burden and enter into His rest. They loved and served Him here;
they enjoy unclouded peace and rest as they wait with Him there. The outcome,
the end of all their life’s work, toil, testimony is Christ. They enjoy
Him to the full now; they have, as it were, left Him as a priceless legacy to
us here.

Their life was a life of faith—the
refusal at once both of creature righteousness and creature strength. They had
learned to "rejoice in Christ Jesus and have no confidence in the
flesh" (Phil. 3:3). We are not called to do, in detail, their work. God
calls and fits each of His servants for some special work, peculiarly suited to
the special gift with which he is endowed. We are not to be imitators of one
another, but ever to be imitators of the faith that casts the feeble
upon the Mighty.

Lastly, we note the warning not to
be "carried about with divers and strange doctrines" (Heb. 13:9). The
servant of Christ ever stands for His truth against all opposition of error.
His ministry, in so far as it was under the guidance and in the power of the
Holy Spirit, brought home to heart and conscience the truth of God and the
Person of the Lord.

 

Do we not need to be especially on
our guard in these days against the subtle inroads of error? The Person of the
Son of God, His atoning work, His Church, the destiny of man—are all objects of
the enemy’s attacks. Let us hold fast the truth, and Him who is the truth, and
His Word of truth.

We have, then four characteristics
of a proper memorial of departed leaders:(1) The Word of God ministered by
them; (2) the outcome or issue of their life, Christ for them and for us ever
the same; (3) the faith which occupied them with this blessed Person; and (4)
the warning against error. If we ever have these features before us, there will
be only profit in remembering those who have gone on before us.

Law and Grace (Part 1)




by R

John 1:17. "The law was given
by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ." Law and
grace are diverse principles; the law demands, grace gives.

Gal. 3:10,13. The law says,
"Cursed is every one who continues not in all things that are
written in the book of the law to do them." The law has cursed every
soul that is under it
, for none have fully kept it. In contrast, Christ has
redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us."

Rom. 10:4. "Christ is the end
of the law for righteousness of every one who believes." Christ not only
fully kept the law and glorified God in all His life, but died for our sins,
bore for us the law’s curse, and He is our righteousness before God.

Rom. 7:4-6. "Wherefore, my
brethren, you also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ, that you
should be married to another, even to Him who is raised from the dead, that we
should bring forth fruit unto God. The believer has "become dead to the
law
" by Christ’s death, that we should be married to the One who is
raised from the dead.

Gal. 2:16-21. "I through the
law am dead to the law" (condemned, put to death by it, and so dead
to it) "that I might live unto God." This deliverance from the law,
and joy in God’s grace, gives power to please God and walk in His ways.

Gal. 5:1. The apostle’s
exhortation is:"Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith
Christ has made us free, and be not entangled again in the yoke of bondage,
that is, the yoke of the law which, the apostle Peter says, "neither our
fathers nor we were able to bear" (Acts 15:10).

The apostle Paul writing to the
Galatian saints who had received the gospel, had been saved by it, and
delivered from the bondage of the law, asks, "How do you turn again to the
weak and beggarly elements, whereunto you desire again to be in bondage?"
(Gal. 4:9). He also testifies to them:"Christ has become of no effect
unto you who are justified by the law; you are fallen from grace" (Gal.
5:4). These are searching truths for those who would, in this
"dispensation of the grace of God," put themselves under the law.

 

Some may say, and have said,
"This doctrine of `grace’ for the life and walk of believers is a very
dangerous doctrine, for it allows them to live in sin, to please themselves,
with no restraint. This very question is raised and answered in Romans 6. The
answer is, "God forbid. How shall we who are dead to sin live any
longer therein?
" The truth is, the true believer, being born of God,
now hates sin (as before he loved it), and his earnest desire is to live and
"walk in newness of life." He loves God and hates sin. "The love
of Christ constrains us, because we thus judge that … He died for all, that
they who live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto Him who
died for them and rose again
" (2 Cor. 5:14,15). Love to our blessed
Lord is the power for the new life.

The standard for the daily walk of
the believer is a high standard; it is higher than the law, it is Christ
Himself. "As you have received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in Him"
(Col. 2:6-8).

Col. 3:1. "If you then be
risen with Christ, seek those things that are above, where Christ sits on the
right hand of God."

1 John 2:6. "He who says he
abides in Him ought himself also so to walk even as He walked."

1 Pet. 2:21. "For even
hereunto were you called, because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an
example that you should follow His steps."

John 10:27. "My sheep hear my
voice, and I know them, and they follow Me."

The believer in Christ is born
again—born of God (1 Pet. 1:13; John 1:13). He is justified by faith, and at
peace with God (Rom. 5:1). This is all of God’s grace. "It is of faith,
that it might be by grace" (Rom. 4:16). Again, in Eph. 2:8-10, "For
by grace are you saved through faith; and that not of yourselves,
it is the gift of God:not of works, lest any man should boast.
For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God
has before ordained that we should walk in them." Think of it,
fellow-believer; what marvelous grace!

Acts 13:39 shows what the law could
not
do for the believer:"By Him [Jesus] all who believe are justified
from all things, from which you could not be justified by the law of
Moses." Since "no man is justified by the law in the sight of
God" (Gal. 3:11), how can the law be either the rule of life or of daily
walk for him who is not under it (Gal. 5:18), who is dead to it (Rom. 7:4), and who is by faith united to the risen, glorified Man at God’s right hand? In
Gal. 2:21, the Holy Spirit’s emphatic statement is, "For if righteousness
come by [or, is through] the law, then Christ is dead in vain," that is,
has died for nothing. With the Word of God in his hands, how can the believer
go back again to the law, when the law is not of faith, but is the
ministration of death, written and engraved in stones? (2 Cor. 3:6-11).

In what we have had before us from
the Word of God, it is plain that the law has no claim upon the believer. He is
looked upon as freed from the law. His standing before God in grace
is perfect, because it is in Christ, being accepted in the beloved (Col. 2:10;
Eph. 1:6)—not accepted in himself, or anything he has done, or for any
righteousness of his own, but accepted in the full value of Christ’s finished
work for him.

(From Help and Food, Vol.
33.)

The Lord’s Prayer




by Paul L

The so-called "Lord’s
Prayer" (Matt. 6:9-13; Luke 11:2-4; perhaps more appropriately called the
"Disicples’ Prayer"), and the way it is often used, have been
severely criticized in some quarters. Some of the criticism is deserved because
of the way people have misused it by thinking that the number of times they
recite it has as much value as the words themselves.

Some of the criticism, however, is
undeserved, in my judgment. There are some who have gone to the opposite
extreme of teaching that this prayer has absolutely no relevance to the
Christian today. Thus we hear objections such as the following:

1. Praying to "our Father who
is in heaven" suggests that He is a great distance away from us.

2. Praying "Thy kingdom
come" is cruel because vast numbers of people will perish when Christ
comes to set up His earthly kingdom.

3. Praying "give us this day
our daily bread" is totally unnecessary when our refrigerators and
freezers are well stocked.

4. Praying "forgive us our
debts as we forgive our debtors" makes God’s forgiveness of us dependent
upon our works.

5. There is no mention of praying
"in Jesus’ name" (John 14:13,14; 16:24,26).

I do not propose that we adopt
this exact prayer for our use today. There are many more themes and topics of
prayer for the Christian than are covered by this one. Also, if we understand
what it means to pray "in Jesus’ name" (that is, we are confident
that Jesus is praying the very same thing for us), it brings great value to our
prayers. But I do propose that every theme of this prayer and every
principle lying behind it can indeed be a valid topic of prayer for the
Christian today.

Let me begin by quoting two highly
esteemed authorities on this point:"Such prayer intelligently used
[my italics] is in [no] wise inconsistent with Christian position" (F.W.
Grant, The Numerical Bible, Matthew, p. 92). "There is not a clause
of that prayer, I believe, but what one might proffer now, even to ‘Forgive us
our debts as we forgive our debtors’" (W. Kelly, Lectures on the Gospel
of Matthew
, p. 153).

"Our Father who art in
heaven." Does this really denote distance when it will take only "a
moment, a twinkling of an eye" (1 Cor. 15:52) for us to be raised from earth
to heaven at the Rapture? It is blessedly true that our position in Christ is
"in the heavenlies" (Eph. 2:6 JND), so as we address our Father in
heaven we are reminded of the fact that we are there too, in Christ.

"Hallowed be Thy name."
In an age when the names of God and of His Son are being trampled on and used
so carelessly, well might we desire that His name be treated with the greatest
respect and holiness—beginning with ourselves.

 

"Thy kingdom come."
"For this kingdom of the Father we must look beyond all dispensations to
the sabbath of God’s own rest. To confound it with the millennium whould be an
entire mistake and necessarily lower its character terribly" (F.W. Grant, The
Numerical Bible
). Should we not desire the eternal state in which Christ
has "delivered up the kingdom to God" after having "put all
enemies under His feet" (1 Cor. 15:24-28)? Consistent with our desire for
the coming of our Father’s kingdom would be our desire that Christ should be
the absolute Ruler of our personal lives.

"Thy will be done in earth,
as it is in heaven." It seems that with each new generation man has more
of an attitude of doing "that which [is] right in his own eyes"
(Judg. 21:25). How much better off this world would be if its inhabitants
desired God’s will, rather than their own to be done. Again, it is well
to make it personal:"Not my will but Thine be done in all
that I say and do today."

"Give us this day our daily
bread." Let us acknowledge daily our dependence upon the grace and mercy
of our Father for our every physical, material, and spiritual need. Even if our
refrigerators, freezers, and pantries are well-stocked today, things can change
quickly with a prolonged power outage or an unexpected layoff from one’s
employment.

"Forgive us our debts, as we
forgive our debtors" (see also verses 14,15). It must be remembered that
the disciples are being taught to pray to their "Father." The prayer
is for a Father’s forgiveness of His child’s sin and waywardness, rather than
God’s judicial forgiveness of our sins when we first trust in Christ. Just as
King David could not enjoy his salvation until he had repented of his
sin concerning Bathsheba and her husband (Psa. 51:12), so we will not be able
to enjoy a sense of God’s forgiveness of our sins if we show an
unforgiving spirit toward others. Furthermore, if one who says he/she is a
believer in Christ but is steadfastly determined not to forgive one who
has deeply offended or sinned against him/her, we might well wonder if that
person has truly entered into a relationship with Christ as Lord and
Saviour.

"Lead us not into temptation,
but deliver us from evil." Let us not be like Peter who boasted,
"Lord, I am ready to go with Thee, both into prison and to death"
(Luke 22:33). This prayer expresses a proper lack of self-confidence
with regard to handling trials and temptations, as well as a proper dependence
upon God in case He should lead us into a trial or testing.

In conclusion, I am not advocating
the adoption of this prayer as something we do by rote or routine. But from
time to time it would be well to ask ourselves whether we are including the
different elements of this "Disciples’ Prayer" into our own prayers
to "our Father."

 

Answers To Assignments For 1998

ANSWERS TO ASSIGNMENTS FOR 1998

1. 2 Cor. 12:4 and either 5 or 9 or 10 (write out two verses).

2. That person, if truly saved, will go to heaven because he has eternal life (John 3:16), shall never perish (John 10:28), shall not come into judgment (John 5:24), is kept by the power of God (1 Pet. 1:5), cannot be plucked out of God’s hand (John 10:28,29), and is sealed by the Holy Spirit (Eph. 1:13; 4:30). Any one of these or other appropriate verses should be written out.)

3. John 1:12; Col. 2:6 (write out both).

4. John 14:6; Acts 4:12 (write out both).

5. Old Testament: David (2 Sam. 11:4-17; 12:13; 24:10,25; write out at least two verses); New Testament: Peter (Luke 22:43-61; John 21:15-17); or Prodigal Son (Luke 15:11-14,15-16); write out at least two verses.

6. (a) Col. 2:12; (b) Col. 2:20; Col. 3:1,2 (write out at least three verses).

7. Heb. 12:1,2 (write out both verses).

8. Brother B might have said: “I appreciate your concern. I want to do what is pleasing to God. I am not aware of any scripture that suggests that what I am doing is wrong or displeasing to the Lord. Perhaps you can help me.” Another answer, submitted by one of our students is this: “Brother A, I appreciate your concern about my habit of smoking a pipe!! I must admit that I have felt the gentle urging of the Holy Spirit for some time now to stop smoking. The fact that you are bringing the subject up confirms to me that the Lord doesn’t want me polluting my body in this way anymore. I am glad that you had the courage to talk to me about this in a straightforward, non-judgmental, and private manner. I realize that my body is the temple of the Holy Spirit and I want to stop this filthy habit. Will you pray with me that I won’t crave the tobacco anymore and have strength to stop pipe smoking?”

9. Rom. 12:5; 1 Tim. 3:15; Rev. 19:7 (write out each verse).

10. Andrew found his brother Simon, told him about the Messiah, and brought him to Jesus (John 1:40-42).

11. Proverbs 10:17; 12:1; 15:10, 32 (write out three verses).

12. (2 points) (a) Acts 18:27; 2 Cor. 3:1 (write out both verses); (b) Rom. 16:1,2 (write out both), (c) Rom. 15:26; 1 Cor. 16:3 (write out both).

13. (a) Acts 4:31; 12:5 or 12 (prayer meeting) (write out both verses); (b) Acts 4:31 (no need to write out again); 12:7-11,17 (write out one or more verses).

14. Elders should (a) feed the flock of God, (b) do it willingly, (c) do it with a ready mind and not concerned about how much it pays, and (d) be examples to the flock (1 Pet. 5:2,3). The younger believers should submit themselves unto the elders (1 Pet. 5:5).

15. The brother repented and had sorrow for his sin, making Paul glad (2 Cor. 2:2,7); the assembly was now to forgive him, comfort him, and confirm their love toward him (2 Cor. 2:7,8) (write out two verses).

16-1. Eternal life is life that is never ending (1 Thess. 4:17), and it is a totally new kind of life, with God and Jesus Christ as the focus (John 17:3).

16-2. Such verses cannot be found!

16-3. Being enlightened, tasting, and made partakers in verses 4 and 5 refer to the superficial responses of professing Christians. If they turn back to Judaism or some other religion, they are saying that Jesus Christ really did deserve to be crucified after all, and they will not find salvation in anything or Anyone but Christ.

16-4. It is important to hold the doctrine of eternal security because (a) the Bible teaches it, (b) it causes us to praise, worship, serve, and obey God out of appreciation for His great love and grace toward us, and (c) it keeps us from trying to add something of our own doing to the work that Christ finished for us (give at least two of these reasons).

16-5. Water baptism symbolizes (a) the death, burial, and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ; (b) our being dead to sin and alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord.

16-6. First of all, we are to obey them, but not out of fear of a penalty but out of appreciation for what Christ has suffered for our sakes. Second, (a) much more than not committing murder, we seek to lead souls to eternal life in Christ; (b) much more than not stealing, we work so that we can give to those in need; and (c) much more than not taking God’s name in vain, we preach Christ as the only name by which one can be saved.

16-7. 1 Cor. 12:12 and others (write out one verse).

16-8. An important activity of the members of the body of Christ is reproof, correction, and rescue of one another when we wander away from the Lord and fall into sin.

16-9. Evidences that the local churches in New Testament days were united together: (a) believers carried letters of commendation when visiting another assembly; (b) the apostle Paul in his epistles reminded the churches of their unity with other assemblies; (c) the richer assemblies sent financial aid to the poorer ones; (d) believers of different ethnic backgrounds were joined together in one body; and (e) differences in doctrine and practice among assemblies were discussed and resolved.

16-10. 1 Pet. 2:5,9; Rev. 1:6 (write out two of these verses).

16-11. (a) Qualifications of an overseer: Tit. 1:6-9 (write out one verse); (b) qualifications of a deacon: 1 Tim. 3:8-12 (write out one verse).

16-12. Write out Matt. 18:15-17 or 1 Cor. 5:13.

Foundations of Faith

Running the Race

How do you know if your boyfriend/girlfriend is the right one for you?

Question:
How do you know if your boyfriend/girlfriend is the right one for you?

Answer:
God brought the woman to the man in the first marriage (Genesis 2:22), and He brings men and women together today by His Word.

(1) He tells us that the believer is not to marry an unsaved person. “Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for…what part hath he that believeth with an infidel [unbeliever]?” (2 Corinthians 6:14, 15). The Lord asks: “Can two walk together except they be agreed?” (Amos 3:3), especially if not agreed about Christ!
(2) The believer is “at liberty to be married to whom she [he] will; only in the Lord” (1 Corinthians 7:39). The expression “in the Lord” is more than being “in Christ,” which is true of every believer (2 Corinthians 5:17). To be “in the Lord” means that both the man and the woman seek to please the Lord. Thus there will be one Boss in the marriage, even Christ Himself.
So the Lord may give you the assurance that your boyfriend/girlfriend is the right one for you if:
(1) He/she shows he/she is saved, by living like Christ (Matthew 7:20).
(2) He/she puts Christ and His things first in his/her life (Colossians 3:1-3).
(3) Your boyfriend/girlfriend is a close friend that you can share everything with (Amos 3:3).
(4) You delight in the Lord, and He has given you the desire to spend your life with that person (Psalm 37:4, 5).(5) “The nurture and admonition of the Lord” from the Scriptures has been your guidance to make this most important decision (Ephesians 6:4).

Why do we believe in a guarded table for anyone who breaks bread?

Question:
Why do we believe in a closed [or guarded] table, instead of an open table for anyone who is a Christian to break bread?

Answer:

In regards to who we as Christians break bread with, we know that the Lord Jesus only desires those who are Christians to “come together” and fellowship in the breaking of bread.

Why we know this is because we are given the doctrine, teaching (the meaning) of the bread and cup in the Lord’s Supper in 1 Corinthians 10:15-17: “I speak as to wise men; judge ye what I say. The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread.”

You will remember that when the Lord instituted His supper that He first broke the bread and then passed the cup. But when the Spirit of God through the apostle Paul presents the meaning of these emblems, He first mentions “the cup of blessing”! It represents that from which all blessing flows: “the blood of Christ.” Why is the cup mentioned first? Because a person must have “communion” or fellowship with the blood of Christ to partake of the Lord’s Supper.

Therefore this is one reason we know that the Lord Jesus only desires those who are Christians to “come together” and fellowship in the breaking of bread.

In order to keep this exclusive for Christians only, we have to guard the local table (usually where we are breaking bread) from those whom the assembly does not know.

The word “communion” in 1 Corinthians 10:16 & 17 means fellowship. We have to know a person to have fellowship with him. Also, not only must a person be saved but he must know he is saved. He must be able to say as the apostle without doubt: “I am not ashamed: for I know Whom I have believed, and am persuaded that He is able to keep that which I have committed unto Him against that day” (2 Timothy 1:12). Also, since the Lord has given the local assembly the responsibility to receive a person to fellowship in the breaking of bread (Matthew 18:17-20; Romans 15:7), the assembly is to know that the person is saved by their actions. The Lord says: “Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them” (Matthew 7:20).

Also, there were those who were put out of their local fellowship and lost their privilege to break bread because of unrepented sin (see 1 Corinthians 5:9-13). We have to honor God’s discipline in other assemblies.

The reason for this is because Christ announced: “I will build My church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it” (Matthew 16:18). After He died and rose again, God “put all things under His feet, and gave Him to be the head over all things to the church,

which is His body, the fullness of him that filleth all in all” (Ephesians 1:22-23). “And the Lord added to the church daily those who were being saved” (Acts 2:47). So there is only “one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling” (Ephesians 4:4). Each assembly is linked with every other assembly that seeks to represent the one church, the one body of Christ.

So Paul wrote to the assembly at Corinth: “Unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both theirs and ours” (1 Corinthians 1:2). Distance is the only thing that should keep the assemblies apart. We have the same teaching, the same Head (Christ) and the same Holy Spirit. Though the Lord has given the responsibility to the local “two or three” who are gathered unto His name to judge those who are within the assembly or desire to come in (1 Corinthians 5:12-13; Matthew 18:17-20).

If a person was put out of a “church” in another area and showed up at a local assembly, we are bound to check this person out before they are allowed to break bread. This can’t be done 2 minutes before remembrance meeting.

We are also not to have any fellowship (that is what we are doing, by the way, in breaking bread) with those who hold doctrinal evils (see 2 John 7-11). We believe that a local assembly must be responsible for who it allows to break bread, not the person who wants to break bread. (See Matthew 18:17-20; 1 Corinthians 5:4-13).

Many misuse the verse: “Let a man examine himself and so let him eat” (1 Corinthians 11:28) to mean that it is up to the individual who shows up at the breaking of bread to decide for himself whether he has the right to break bread there. If you read that verse in context, it applies only to those who were already received in fellowship at that location.

First Corinthians was written to those already in fellowship: “Paul, called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, and Sosthenes our brother, unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both theirs and ours” (1 Corinthians 1:1-2).

“But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup” (1 Corinthians 11:28-32), is a test each person should do before we eat of the Lord’s Supper (1 Corinthians 11:20). We should examine (judge): (1) the company we keep, (2) the habits we have, (3) our affections; (4) our motives; (5) our thoughts.

If we allow anyone who shows up at the Lord’s Supper to partake on the basis he says he is a Christian, we could allow many cult members to remember the Lord. Ask any Jehovah’s Witnesses or Mormons if they are Christians, and they will say, “Yes.” However, their doctrine says they are not Christians for they do not believe that Jesus is God. This is why the assembly has the responsibility to ‘check out,’ “judge them that are within,” so as to not fellowship with evil in this most holy and sacred privilege we have as believers.

The Scriptures give as reason for a guarded table to be that evil, whether doctrinal or moral, defiles! “Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners” (1 Corinthians 15:33; Haggai 2:12, 13 (JND); see Dan Kasper’s article on the guarded table). The reason why the man living with his father’s wife had to be removed from fellowship in the assembly was: “Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump? Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us: Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth” (1 Corinthians 5:6-8).

Leaven or yeast is always used in the Scriptures to represent evil. The only thing that stops the yeast from being active is to put it in the fire. Likewise, the only thing that stops the working of unjudged sin is to judge it: “For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged” (1 Corinthians 11:31). The judgment of the assembly is in view of the person who is sinning to judge the sin before the Lord and then to the person/s he has wronged which includes his brethren in the assembly.

In the case of the man in 1 Corinthians 5, the apostle wrote for the assembly at Corinth to restore him. “Sufficient to such a man is this punishment, which was inflicted of many.  . . . To whom ye forgive anything, I forgive also: for if I forgave anything, to whom I forgave it, for your sakes forgave I it in the person of Christ; Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices” (2 Corinthians 2:6, 10-11).

Also, the assembly at Corinth had been wrong in not judging the man before Paul wrote his first letter to them: “And ye are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that he that hath done this deed might be taken away from among you” (1 Corinthians 5:2). In 2 Corinthians 7 the apostle tells of their sorrow to repentance: “Now I rejoice, not that ye were made sorry, but that ye sorrowed to repentance: for ye were made sorry after a godly manner, that ye might receive damage by us in nothing. For godly sorrow worketh repentance to salvation not to be repented of: but the sorrow of the world worketh death. For behold this selfsame thing, that ye sorrowed after a godly sort, what carefulness it wrought in you, yea, what clearing of yourselves, yea, what indignation, yea, what fear, yea, what vehement desire, yea, what zeal, yea, what revenge! In all things ye have approved yourselves to be clear in this matter” (verses 9-11).

If you are saved, not practicing sinning and you agree with the doctrines of those who are in fellowship, you should be breaking bread. All you have to do is ask for your place to begin experiencing this great blessing and honor to worship the Lord and break bread.

In our assemblies, those who are allowed to break bread also receive the liberty to teach, use their gifts, and preach. Surely an assembly would be in trouble if someone who could not pass the scriptural requirements of fellowship in the breaking of bread, were then allowed the privileges in the classroom and pulpit. These things do work together. (See 1 Corinthians 12:13-31; Ephesians 4:7, 11-16; Romans 12:3-8.)

(Italic is by the—Editor.)