Matthew 20:17-28 begins as it ends, with an announcement of the cross. We are first told what
our Lord would do, then that He came to do it.
Between the two announcements the disciples display their eager interest in that which savors of
worldly honor, and receive the needed correction from Him who came not only to give "himself
for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity," but also to "purify unto himself a peculiar
people, zealous of good works" (Titus 2:14).
En route to Jerusalem, where the nation should have rejoiced to welcome and honor Him as their
Messiah, He privately instructs the twelve as to what is before Him:(1) arrival with them at
Jerusalem, despite its enmity; (2) betrayal unto the Jewish leaders, not naming the traitor; (3)
condemnation by them, even unto death (contrast Rom. 8:1, "no condemnation" for us now); (4)
delivery (same word as "betrayed") to the Gentiles; (5) mistreatment at their hands; (6) crucifixion
_"even the death of the cross"; (7) third day, resurrection.
He does not here speak of the accomplishing value of His sufferings, but only of the fact, followed
by out-resurrection. If they loved Him_and they did, Judas excepted_was not this enough to stir
them to the very depths? Nor was this the first time He had so spoken (see Matt. 16:21;
17:9,22,23). How slow were they to understand! How like ourselves! Does He not identify the
trouble exactly, when in Luke 24:25 He says to the two, "O fools, and slow of heart to believe"?
Mark 10:35 tells us the request for exalted positions at either side of our Lord came from James
and John; Matthew, that the petition was presented for them by their mother. They apprehended
His announcement sufficiently to feel assured that "thy kingdom" and "thy glory" (Mark 10:37)
would be realized beyond the cross; at the same time their self-seeking showed that they had no
proper conception of either.
What! His kingdom one in which places of honor are occupied by those who are merely shrewd
enough to anticipate them and first apply for them? Far be the thought! Rather, "thy will be done
in earth, as it is in heaven" will characterize the kingdom (Matt. 6:10). Why, even in our human
bodies "hath God set the members every one of them . . . as it hath pleased him" (I Cor. 12:18);
how much more will all arrangements in the glory reflect the surpassing wisdom of God!
The two disciples would use their mother, who appears willing enough to serve, as a mediatress
to gain their point. Is He, in whose exaltation they crave such a large part, a King who bestows
favors thus? Will they imitate Adonijah (I Kings 2:13-17), forgetting that "a greater than Solomon
is here"?
Legitimate natural relationships are of God, who said, "It is not good that the man should be
alone." In providing for this need, He tells us it is "an help meet for him" whom He "builds" and
brings to the man; such an help as could not be found in the animal world beneath man, but must
be taken from Adam’s opened side (Gen. 2:18-24). The possession by man of a social nature,
then, is a display of the wisdom and the goodness of God. The object of social surroundings is the
"help" of man.
From the very beginning of the race, we have a divinely given test for every social appeal which
may present itself:Is it a "help"? In the light of the known will of God, whom we are responsible
to glorify, and considering all man’s interests_physical, moral, spiritual, temporal, eternal_is
this thing which asks our attention really "good" for man? If it is not, then we must refuse it,
avoid it, flee from it, and witness against it. Young Christians, young people who are saved, all
fellow-believers to whom this may come, let us have our "senses exercised to discern both good
and evil," exercising ourselves like Paul, "to have always a conscience void of offence toward
God, and toward men," remembering that "whatsoever is not of faith is sin" (Heb. 5:14; Acts
24:16; Rom 14:23).
It was part of Adam’s failure that he allowed a natural relationship, legitimate enough in itself and
in its proper place, to come between himself and the known will of God (see Gen. 3:17). So Isaac,
Solomon, and how many others!
James and John would here intrude natural ties into spiritual matters_the Lord should exalt them
because their mother presents their application! No qualifications are submitted to show their
fitness for such positions; no outstanding achievements, even, are referred to, in support of her
plea; still she asks for the places_they are her sons! And this from Him who had made it clear
that He acted on quite other principles (John 2:4; Matt. 12:46-50).
We expect to find, but nevertheless despise, such procedure among men of the world; how
unbecoming to find it among the people of God! Would we introduce these earthly ways into "the
glory" and "the kingdom"? Would it be the kind of glory for which our spirits yearn, if such
principles had a place there? Neither have they any right in Christian fellowship here. How careful
we need to be, lest allowing considerations of family or friendship to enfeeble our sense of the
claims of love and righteousness, we promote favoritism, lose the confidence of our brethren,
grieve and dishonor Him who cannot but rebuke such ways.
To the two disciples our Lord replies, "Ye know not what ye ask." Their request has displayed
not only their selfishness, their desire to outstrip their companions, their willingness to bring the
glory down to the level of earthly politics, but also their ignorance. They are beyond their depth.
The kingdom is morally superior to all their thoughts of it; position there involves more than they
have realized, and is enjoyed on the basis of principles quite different from those which they
propose.
Their mother drops out of the picture; the Saviour will not negotiate through a third party. He will
deal with the principals themselves, and bring them face to face with the deep underlying issues
involved.
One question would He ask, which will bring them to consider the earthly path of suffering which
precedes the kingdom:"Are ye able to drink of the cup that I shall drink of, and to be baptized
with the baptism that I am baptized with?" Thus He calls them back to His announcement of the
cross, and raises the question of their ability.
Eager to qualify for the coveted honor, they reply, with self-confidence which reminds one of
Peter, "We are able." Assertiveness may make a place for us among men; but it is the "meek and
quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price" (I Pet. 3:4).
He gives, and does not give. He gives them the privilege of suffering, but the place in glory it was
neither theirs to ask nor His to give. He will not express a preference on such a matter, being
entirely satisfied with the Father’s will.
They asked for glory; He grants them suffering, which He will not fail to recompense. They have
ambitions for the future; he points to a path for the present, which leads on to the future. In the
Father’s perfect will, the Saviour’s glory lay beyond the cross; they, and we, should be armed
with the same mind.
O, the perfect harmony manifested in the Godhead! The Son finds His delight in doing the
Father’s will, and in awaiting that will, while the Father finds and expresses His delight in the
Son. Harmony and happiness for His people, here on the earth now, and then in the glory, are to
be found in subjection to His will.
And when those "for whom it is, prepared of my Father" are at last assigned their positions in the
kingdom, the saints meantime having been glorified and therefore having come to know as we are
known, will we not then recognize the divine wisdom as seen in the various appointments, and
praise Him for having so "prepared"?
As we will then enjoy the spiritual enlargement to appreciate and approve the divine arrangements,
quite apart from envy, rivalry, or worldly ambition; may we not even now by faith anticipate that
happy scene, devoting ourselves contentedly to the diligent pursuit of the opportunities which our
present divinely "prepared" circumstances afford? "But as God hath distributed to every man, as
the Lord hath called every one, so let him walk"; for hath He not said "godliness with contentment
is great gain"?
The ten disciples are not content to leave the affair where the Word of the Lord has put it; they
must show their "indignation against the two brethren" who have sought to gain an advantage over
them. What kind of zeal is this? It but classifies them with the others in needing the Lord’s
correction.
He "called them unto him," that it may all be settled, as a matter between brethren, in His
presence. Happy for the saints if all our problems had been settled thus! Then, He "said." His
will, made known in His Word, is the answer to every difficulty among His people. "Thy word
have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee." "If a man love me, he will keep my
words" (Psa. 119:11; John 14:23).
The disciples need to learn that the principles of His kingdom are not those of the nations.
"Dominion" and "authority" go with greatness in Gentile circles; not so in that precious sphere
which He refers to by the words "among you," occurring thrice in two verses.
"Among you" is not exactly the assembly as such, though it is the material of the assembly, and
on earth. The desire for greatness here properly expresses itself in ministering to others; the one
who wills to be "first" is to take the low place of the love bond-slave in serving his brethren. For
love delights to serve, to promote the well-being of the objects loved, "vaunteth not itself, is not
puffed up … seeketh not her own," as is witnessed in the case of the perfect Servant, the Son of
man. As Son of God, Creator, Upholder of all things, Redeemer, Head of the assembly, King of
Kings, and Lord of Lords, surely He is entitled to universal uninterrupted homage. Yet in His
deep love for His own He "came not to be ministered unto, but to minister."
Under the administration of our blessed Lord Jesus Christ, the ten need have no fear that James
and John will succeed in gaining any advantage over them by resorting to unbecoming methods;
nor is their "indignation" therefore re-required, or profitable.
The various kinds of service are not enlarged upon here; the emphasis being rather upon the spirit
of the service. Love will find enough to do, and ways of doing it, enlightened by the Word and
guided by the Spirit, following in His steps.
It remains to notice that there is that in Him which separates Him infinitely from us. As in nature
He is Son of man as is none other, and Son of God as well; so in work He alone could and did
"give his life a ransom for many." This takes us to the value of His work upon the cross. He
provided redemption, shedding His precious blood for our sins.
If anyone reading these lines has not yet accepted Him as your own Saviour, will you not do so
now, by faith, and be saved?